|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sati（念）とSampajañña（正知）=Sati (mindfulness) and Sampajañña (awareness) |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
藤本晃 (著)=Fujimoto, Akira (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.66 n.2 (總號=n.144) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2018.03.20 |
|---|
| ページ | 899 - 895 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 実証仏教学; 念; 正知; サティ; ラベリング |
|---|
| 抄録 | Westernized Buddhist studies began in Japan after the Meiji restoration. Most of them were philologically oriented and rare studies have been made from the view of practical meditation.
Monks have been teaching Buddhist insight meditation, and “Mindfulness” meditation based on insight meditation has been growing more popular in the U.S. and Japan since the 1980’s. But the term “Mindfulness” seems to be interpreted and used arbitrarily by teachers. Buddhist scholars should commit to “Mindfulness” meditation movement from a Buddhist context.
Mindfulness means to label any object as it is; this object means any phenomena or feeling occurring in one’s mind. Practitioners keep labeling as many objects arising in their mind as they can. For example, “sound, sound, pain, pain, pain.” They have no time to think of those objects, because they are too busy concentrating on labeling. An object arises and disappears momentarily and another arises in no time. Therefore practitioners must be mindful of occurring objects in their mind. When one is mindful of objects occurring in one’s thoughts, one’s mind becomes very clear and awakened. This is called “awareness.”
When practitioners realize that these objects are momentary, impermanent, and thus with no value, they reach enlightenment. But long before that, they can feel joy, lightness and “awake-ness” by their concentration. Such change of mind and body benefits practitioners’ lives. Thus “Mindfulness” meditation has become popular. |
|---|
| 目次 | 1. 仏道実践における念の意味 899
2. 仏道実践の定型的説明における念と正知の役割 898
3. 単独では念と正知の意味の違いが明確になる 896
4. 念と正知の順番は変わらない．なぜ？ 896
5. では，なぜ念と正知がさまざまに説かれるのか？ 895
6. まとめ 895 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.2_899 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 353 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.08.05 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.05 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
