|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
詩的意味の美的知覚:新ニヤーヤ学派ジャガディーシャの暗示理論批判=Perception and Poetic Semantics: Jagadīśa’s Criticism of the Semantic Theory of Suggestion |
|
|
|
著者 |
岩﨑陽一 (著)=Iwasaki, Yoichi (au.)
|
掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
巻号 | v.66 n.2 (總號=n.144) |
出版年月日 | 2018.03.20 |
ページ | 945 - 940 |
出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 日文=Japanese |
キーワード | alaṅkāra; vyañjanā; 修辞学; 意味論; 暗示 |
抄録 | The School of New Logic (Navya-nyāya) does not accept the semantic theory of suggestion (vyañjanā) proposed by the Dhvani School of poetics, which postulates the semantic power of the poet’s words to suggest an unstated poetic senses that are revealed only to competent readers. This paper reviews the argument against suggestion given by Jagadīśa, the 17th-century New Logician, in his Śabdaśaktiprakāśikā (vṛtti to verse 24). He examines the two types of suggestions—lakṣaṇā-mūla-vyañjanā and abhidhā-mūla-vyañjanā—and reduces the first type to metaphorical signification (lakṣaṇā), and the understanding based on the second type to a kind of perception. The theory of suggestion assumes the symmetric communication of poetic senses between the poet and the competent reader, but Jagadīśa’s reductionism of suggestion severed this communication. The reader is freed from the job of restoring the poet’s message, and has the liberty to interpret and relish poems without restraint. This form of liberal poetics conforms with the liberal epistemology of testimony presented by Gaṅgeśa and adopted by Jagadīśa. |
目次 | 1. はじめに―暗示理論と詩的コミュニケーション 945 2. ジャガディーシャの詩論 944 3. ジャガディーシャの詩論の帰結と問題点 942 |
ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.2_945 |
ヒット数 | 240 |
作成日 | 2022.08.05 |
更新日期 | 2022.08.05 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|