|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
《臺灣省通志稿》與《重修臺灣省通志》〈宗教篇·佛教章〉編纂之比較=The Comparative Study on The Compiling And Records of Buddhism Chapters in Religion Section Between The Tongzhi Manuscripts of Taiwan And The Revised Tongzhi of Taiwan |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
蔡政純 (著)=Tsai, Chen-chun (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
臺灣文獻=Taiwan Historica
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.61 n.4 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2010.12 |
|---|
| ページ | 113 - 136 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 國史館臺灣文獻館 |
|---|
| 出版地 | 南投市, 臺灣 [Nantou shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| ノート | 作者為南華大學兼任講師，國立中興大學歷史系博士生 |
|---|
| キーワード | 臺灣佛教=Buddhism in Taiwan; 李添春=Li Tianchun; 張珣=Chang Hsun; 《臺灣省通志稿》=The Tongzhi Manuscripts of Taiwan; 《重修臺灣省通志》=The Revised Tongzhi of Taiwan |
|---|
| 抄録 | 本文比較《臺灣省通志稿》（簡稱《通志稿》）與《重修臺灣省通
志》（簡稱《重修通志》）〈佛教章〉中，佛教傳入臺灣之建立、擴展
與變遷的論述，以探查不同時期編纂之省通志對臺灣佛教纂修所呈現的
差異。兩書〈佛教章〉出版相隔三十六年，臺灣歷經政治上的戒嚴與解
嚴，社會與經濟也有很大的變革。兩書〈佛教章〉所作之臺灣佛教分期
與論述，受資料蒐集與審查者之要求的影響，其編纂視角與史料運用因
而有異。兩書時間跨度不同，對臺灣佛教之分期，「齋教」是否列入佛
教及編纂體例等均有不同做法。《通志稿》之纂寫嚴謹，《重修通志》
則以新體例撰寫。比較兩書〈佛教章〉主要有三項特點：（一）《通志
稿》被認為是臺灣佛教撰述的先行者；《重修通志》乃立於《通志稿》
之基礎上開拓寬廣多元的史料，為承先啟後的後繼者。此由兩書對臺灣
佛教源流；日據時期傳入臺灣之日本佛教宗派；日據時期臺灣佛教變遷
的觀察；兩書在史料運用上有重疊之處等內容看出。（二）兩書撰寫方
式受政治氛圍與官方立場的影響，政治威權高張與否，直接影響纂修的
內容與風格。（三）教徒的自我認同，教派的實質作為與社會上的普遍
看法等社會現實，則是影響兩書是否將齋教列入佛教之內的主要因素。
志書有保留當時代官方與民間記載，或各項調查記錄的功能。因
此，官方當以落實憲法對人民信仰宗教自由的保障為基礎，給予纂修者
適當而足夠的修纂時間；纂修者則應避免受主觀意識的影響，掌握時代
脈動，即時記載；並採取多元而開放的研究方式，以各種方法釐清史料
與保留史料，讓各項記錄得以真實面貌呈現。而被調查之寺廟與個人，
亦應有適當之開放態度，給與研究者更寬容的研究空間，則志書的修纂
將更臻完備。
This study compares the “Buddhism Chapters” of the
“Religion section” from the Tongzhi Manuscripts of Taiwan
(denoted as the “Tongzhi∗∗ Manuscripts”) and the Revised
Tongzhi of Taiwan (denoted as the “Revised Tongzhi”) regarding
the establishment, expansion and development of when and
how the Buddhism came to Taiwan in order to research the
differential impacts due to the different compiling Tongzhi
studies over the Taiwan Buddhists. The “Buddhism Chapters”
from these two books were published thirty-six years apart.
There were great social and economic changes due to the
issuing and the rescinding of the martial laws in Taiwan.
The variations and the discussions of the two “Buddhism
Chapters” differ in the perspectives of compiling and the
applying of the historical records due to the influences of
their data collection methods and different audit requirements.
Each book’s time span covers different stages of Buddhism
in Taiwan. There have been different approaches regarding
whether to include the “Zhaijiao Religion” as Buddhism and how
to differentiate stages of Buddhism. “Tongzhi Manuscripts” was
rigorously written and the “Revised Tongzhi” was composed
with newer formatting styles. By comparing these two books in
the “Buddhism Chapters”, we conclude the following three main
characteristics: (1) “Tongzhi Manuscripts” is considered the
forerunner of the compiling works on Buddhism in Taiwan; and
the “Revised Tongzhi” is recognized as a successor based on
the “Tongzhi Manuscripts” by widening its diversified historical
records. Via the viewpoints on the origins of Buddhism in
Taiwan: The Japanese Buddhism came to Taiwan during the
past Japanese occupation: The observation of the development
of Buddhism in Taiwan under the Japanese occupation; There
have been overlaps in utilizing the historical data from these
two books. (2) The writing styles of these two books were both
influenced by their political atmosphere and the positions from
the authorities. The compiled contents and styles were resulted
directly from the dominant political authorities at their times.
(3) The believer’s self-recognition, the social reality of people’
s general viewpoints and the believers’ achievements are the
major factors to decide whether to accept the “Zhaijiao Religion”
as the realm of Buddhism.
Tongzhi books were used as a functional means to preserve
the contemporary official and personal records, including
their investigation reports. Therefore, the authorities should
provide the bases to protect the freedom of the religious belief
according to constitution law in order to allow the authors
to have their appropriate and sufficient time when compiling
their books. The authors should avoid subjective influence and
record active contemporary events. Additionally, they should
adopt the open and diversified research methods to clarify the
various resources and retain historical data in order to preserve
their genuine historical recordings. And the believers of the
temple should open their mind to aid and support the scopes
of resea |
|---|
| 目次 | 一、前言 115
貳、兩書綱目體例之差異 116
叁、關於兩書〈佛教章〉同異之討論 119
一、兩書如開創者與繼承者之間的關係 119
二、兩書撰寫方式受政治氛圍與官方立場的影響 122
三、社會現實影響兩書是否將齋教列入佛教之內 124
肆、結論 126
|
|---|
| ISSN | 1016457X (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 139 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.08.24 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.24 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
