|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ダルマキールティのアポーハ論におけるākṣepa及びpratikṣepaの考察=A Study of ākṣepa and pratikṣepa in Dharmakīrti’s apoha-theory |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
秦野貴生 (著)=Hatano, Kisho (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.68 n.1 (總號=n.149) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2019.12.20 |
|---|
| ページ | 380 - 376 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | ākṣepa; pratikṣepa; ダルマキールティ; 『プラマーナ・ヴァールッティカ』 |
|---|
| 抄録 | In Dharmakīrti’s apoha-theory, the terms ākṣepa (inclusion) and pratikṣepa (exclusion) are used in arguments concerning property and property-possessor (dharma / dharmin), which are included among linguistic practices such as the universal (sāmānya). In the arguments about property and property-possessor, the distinction between property and property-possessor, a linguistic problem, is explained by turning it into problems such as that of the appearance of conceptual awareness (pratibhāsa), the speaker’s intention, the effect of daily action (vyavahāra), and so on.
In examples of ākṣepa concerned with property and property-possessor, it is stated that words expressing property-possessor include other distinctions, while words expressing property do not. But in the examples of pratikṣepa concerned with property and property-possessor, it is stated that words expressing property exclude other distinctions, while words expressing property-possessor do not. Therefore ākṣepa means negation of pratikṣepa, apratikṣepa, and the negation of ākṣepa means pratikṣepa. |
|---|
| 目次 | 1．はじめに 380
2．pratikṣepa の用例 380
3．ākṣepa の用例 378
4．おわりに 377 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_380 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 73 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.09.23 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.09.23 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
