|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
新ニヤーヤ学派における非存在（abhāva）の記述/定義と〈神話性〉について=Description/Definition of Absence (abhāva) in Navya-nyāya and ‘Mythical Aspects’ |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
和田壽弘 (著)=Wada, Toshihiro (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.68 n.1 (總號=n.149) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2019.12.20 |
|---|
| ページ | 515 - 511 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | シャシャダラ; 『ニヤーヤ・シッダーンタ・ディーパ』; 先行非存在; 世界大帰滅; ガンゲーシャ |
|---|
| 抄録 | Śaśadhara, a Navya-nyāya philosopher active in the 14th century, explains prior absence (prāgabhāva) by referring to the dissolution of a world (pralaya) in the “Causeness Chapter” (Kāraṇatā-vāda) and “Absence Chapter” (Abhāva-vāda) of his Nyāya-siddhānta-dīpa.
Gaṅgeśa, on the other hand, who was contemporary with or immediately following Śaśadhara, defines that absence without referring to such a dissolution in the “Absence Chapter” (Abhāva-vāda) of his Tattva-cintāmaṇi. His attitude with regard to absence represents the method independent of mythical aspects such as that kind of dissolution, and dependent on daily experience. If mythical aspects represent revelation (mokṣa) and the results of rituals, we cannot deny that Navya-nyāya is subject to them. However, it is sure that Gaṅgeśa attempts to avoid those aspects as much as possible, in defining philosophical concepts such as absence. |
|---|
| 目次 | 1．はじめに 515
2．非存在の4分類 515
3．シャシャダラの「原因性章」における先行非存在と世界大帰滅 514
4．ガンゲーシャの TC「非存在章」における先行非存在 513
5．おわりに 512 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_515 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 153 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.09.26 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.09.26 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
