|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
中世禅宗の他宗への反論：『法華問答正義抄』における禅宗側の人物について=Medieval Zen Arguments Against Other Schools: Who Represents the Zen Side in the Hokke Mondo Shōgishō |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
古瀬珠水 (著)=Furuse, Tamami (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.69 n.1 (總號=n.152) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2020.12.25 |
|---|
| ページ | 102 - 107 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 『法華問答正義抄』; 『金綱集』; 禅宗批判 |
|---|
| 抄録 | During medieval times, the Zen school was attacked by other traditional Buddhist schools, particularly the Tendai. Little is known of the Zen reaction to such attacks. The Hokke Mondo Shōgishō 法華問答正義抄,written by a Nichiren monk Nichizen 日全 (1294–1344) in the 14th century, contains a chapters on the Zen School, in which Zen and the Tendai or Nichiren sect argue over Zen’s lineage and its philosophy. A Zen representative replies to his opponents more than 64 times. Although he seems to be very familiar with Zen teaching, he calls Saichō ‘the Fundamental Teacher of Japan’ and speaks of ‘my Eizan,’ implying his allegiance with the Tendai school. Moreover, his manner of arguing is different from that of authentic Zen monks, who refrain from argument and insistence on their beliefs. Consequently, I conclude that the Zen representative in the Hokke Mondo Shōgishō is a Tendai monk who is deeply committed to the Zen teaching spreading at that time. |
|---|
| 目次 | はじめに 102
一 禅宗側の反論 102
二 禅僧の議論に対する姿勢 105
結び 106 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.1_102 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 82 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.10.04 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.10.04 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
