|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
親鸞に現れた観音勢至と弥陀：聖徳太子と法然を中心に=Avalokiteśvara, Mahāsthāmaprāpta, and Amida in Shinran’s Thought: Prince Shōtoku and Hōnen |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
廣田至 (著)=Hirota, Itaru (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.69 n.2 (總號=n.153) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2021.03.25 |
|---|
| ページ | 639 - 642 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 親鸞; 聖徳太子; 法然; 観音; 勢至; 弥陀 |
|---|
| 抄録 | Shinran understands Prince Shōtoku 聖徳太子 to be a manifestation of Avalokiteśvara and Hōnen 法然 to be a manifestation of Mahāsthāmaprāpta. The reason is that Hōnen represents the history of the Original Vow itself, while Prince Shōtoku encouraged Shinran to join in that history, and performs a different function. However, Prince Shōtoku and Hōnen are not simply understood in terms of the framework of Avalokiteśvara and Mahāsthāmaprāpta. Shinran also says that they are manifestations of Amida. This does not mean that Prince Shōtoku simply acted as mercy and Hōnen just acted as wisdom, but that the two functions were inseparable and that the root was Amida Buddha. |
|---|
| 目次 | はじめに 639
一 観音と勢至の示現——聖徳太子と法然—— 639
二 阿弥陀の顕現としての太子と法然 640
おわりに 642 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.2_639 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 46 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.10.07 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.10.07 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
