|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
シャーキャブッディのアポーハ論の思想史的位置付け=A Reconsideration of Śākyabuddhi’s Philosophical Position in the Development of the apoha-theory |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
石田尚敬 (著)=Ishida, Hisataka (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.69 n.2 (總號=n.153) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2021.03.25 |
|---|
| ページ | 841 - 835 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 仏教論理学; アポーハ論; シャーキャブッディ; ラトナキールティ |
|---|
| 抄録 | I recently (Ishida 2020) pointed out that the famous three-stage theory about the development of the apoha-theory, including the views of the positivist (vidhivādin) and the negativist (pratiṣeḍhavādin), was not definitely explained by Satkari Mookerjee, but it is a modified version due to Yuichi Kajiyama. In the course of this investigation, it turned out to be important to distinguish two points: (1) The process of understanding the negation, i.e., exclusion, and (2) The presence or absence of appearance in conceptual cognition. On the basis of this investigation, I reexamine Śākyabuddhi’s philosophical position in the development of the apoha-theory. I think that Śākyabuddhi should be regarded as a forerunner of the so-called positivist, who, according to Ratnakīrti, insists that the negation is indirectly understood when a positive element is recognized through a word. |
|---|
| 目次 | 1．はじめに 841
2．シャーキャブッディをめぐる先行研究の評価 840
3．シャーキャブッディの思想的立場について 838
4．ダルマキールティとシャーキャブッディ 837
5．結論 836 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.2_841 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 70 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.11.22 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.11.22 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
