|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
世俗と変壊=Mundaneness and Impermanence |
|
|
|
著者 |
木村紫 (著)=Kimura Yukari (au.)
|
掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
巻号 | v.69 n.2 (總號=n.153) |
出版年月日 | 2021.03.25 |
ページ | 913 - 908 |
出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 日文=Japanese |
キーワード | 無常; 苦; 道; 諦; 行相; 『勝義空経』 |
抄録 | The Abhidharmamahāvibhāṣā argues on the basis of a sūtra which maintains that something is called mundane (*laukikī) because it changes and perishes. It takes up the question whether the noble path (āryamārga) is mundane so long as it is also conditioned. The noble path is never mundane. But the Abhidharmamahāvibhāṣā only presents the differences between the noble path and mundaneness, and it does not show any reasons for the differences.
The Abhidharmakośabhāṣya cites suffering (duḥkha), the world (loka) and so on as synonyms for appropriative aggregates (upādānaskandha). It defines suffering as follows: suffering is because Āryas have an abhorrence of it, and the world, and suffering is because it perishes (lujyate). The Abhidharmakośabhāṣya argues that all conditioned things are suffering by suffering inherent in conditioning (saṃskāraduḥkhatā). The aspect of impermanent nature draws the aspect of suffering, but the path is not abhorrent to Āryas as it makes them quiet.
The Dharmaskandha, an early Sarvāstivādin text, mentions that the five appropriative aggregates are suffering since perishableness and change are inherent in them. It follows that appropriative aggregates attribute suffering because they are not calm, and against the mind of Āryas. |
目次 | 0.はじめに 913 1.『婆沙論』が提起する問―聖道も世俗か― 913 2.『倶舎論』の説く無常と苦 912 3.無常と苦の行相 911 4.『法蘊足論』で説かれる苦諦 911 5.むすび 909 |
ISSN | 00194344 (P) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.2_913 |
ヒット数 | 88 |
作成日 | 2022.11.26 |
更新日期 | 2022.11.26 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|