|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bhagavadgītā, Sen, and Anderson |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
J. M. Fritzman (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Asian Philosophy: An International Journal of the Philosophical Traditions of the East
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.25 n.4 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2015 |
|---|
| ページ | 319 - 338 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Routledge |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.routledge.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Abingdon, UK [阿賓登, 英國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 抄録 | Joshua Anderson argues that Amartya Sen’s reading of the Bhagavadgītā is not accurate and so it cannot serve as an example of Sen’s comprehensive consequentialism. This article presents Sen’s reading of the Bhagavadgītā and Anderson’s criticisms of Sen’s readings. It discusses three types of readers: history readers, activist readers, and interventionist readers. It gives an interventionist reading of the Bhagavadgītā, supplementing Arjuna’s reasons and contesting those of Kṛṣṇa. It shows that Arjuna’s reasons are cogent and it respectfully argues that Kṛṣṇa’s arguments are incomplete and unconvincing. Even if Arjuna’s reasons are not ultimately decisive, they legitimately feature in his deliberations. It responds to Anderson, urging that Sen correctly advocates comprehensive consequentialism and agent-relativity, rather than cumulative outcomes and agent-neutrality, and that Sen correctly sees these contrasts exemplified in the Bhagavadgītā. It concludes with a discussion of the impartial spectator, kin, and self.
|
|---|
| ISSN | 09552367 (P); 14692961 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2015.1102693 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 50 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.12.26 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.12.26 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
