|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nāgārjunian-Yogācārian Modal Logic versus Aristotelian Modal Logic |
|
|
|
著者 |
Schumann, Andrew (著)
|
掲載誌 |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
巻号 | v.49 n.3 |
出版年月日 | 2021.07 |
ページ | 467 - 498 |
出版者 | Springer |
出版サイト |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 英文=English |
キーワード | Aristotle; Stoics; Chrysippus; logic; modal logic; Na¯ga¯rjuna; Madhyamaka; Yoga¯ca¯ra; nyāya |
抄録 | There are two different modal logics: the logic T assuming contingency and the logic K = assuming logical determinism. In the paper, I show that the Aristotelian treatise On Interpretation (Περί ερμηνείας, De Interpretatione) has introduced some modal-logical relationships which correspond to T. In this logic, it is supposed that there are contingent events. The Nāgārjunian treatise Īśvara-kartṛtva-nirākṛtiḥ-viṣṇoḥ-ekakartṛtva-nirākaraṇa has introduced some modal-logical relationships which correspond to K =. In this logic, it is supposed that there is a logical determinism: each event happens necessarily (siddha) or it does not happen necessarily (asiddha). The Nāgārjunian approach was inherited by the Yogācārins who developed, first, the doctrine of causality of all real entities (arthakriyātva) and, second, the doctrine of momentariness of all real entities (kṣaṇikavāda). Both doctrines were a philosophical ground of the Yogācārins for the logical determinism. Hence, Aristotle implicitly used the logic T in his modal reasoning. The Madhyamaka and Yogācāra schools implicitly used the logic K = in their modal reasoning.
|
目次 | Abstract Introduction Madhyamaka and Logic Some General Remarks on Modal Logic Some General Remarks on Translations of Logical Terms Aristotelian Modal Logic Logical Determinism and hetutā Nāgārjuna’s Intuition towards Modal Logic Conclusion References |
ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
ヒット数 | 115 |
作成日 | 2022.12.30 |
更新日期 | 2022.12.30 |

|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|