|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
李華撰『故左溪大師碑』をめぐる諸問題=Problems of Li Hua’s “Epitaph for Zuoxi Xuanlang” |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
長倉信祐 (著)=Nagakura, Shinyu (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.70 n.1 (總號=n.155) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2021.12.20 |
|---|
| ページ | 81 - 86 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 『故左溪大師碑』; 玄朗; 李華; 湛然; 傅大士; 初期禅宗 |
|---|
| 抄録 | Li Hua 李華 （715/717-766/774）, a disciple of Zhanran 湛然 （711-782）, produced an inscription recording the achievements of Zuoxi Xuanlang 左渓玄朗 （674-754）, the Gu Zuoxi dashi bei 故左溪大師碑. Atsushi Ibuki of Tōyō University, in his “Literati Understandings of Chan and Tiantai Buddhism as Seen in Li Hua’s Epitaph for Zuoxi Xuanlang” （李華撰『故左溪大師碑』に見る知識人の仏教認識, Bukkyō shisō no tenkai 仏教思想の展開, 2020）, examined the background of this inscription compiled in the later years after the demise of Heze shenhui 荷沢神会 （684-758）, and argued that the inscription is an example of the avoidance of reference to Shenhui, and that the fact that it mentions the early Chan school rather than the Tiantai lineage is extremely important for understanding the formation of the concept of the Chan ancestral lineage. In particular, he proposed that the Buddhist perception of the of Tang period laypersons belonging to the intellectual class was based on the early Chan school. In this paper, I focus on words from the inscription not given special attention by Atsushi, namely Fuxi 傅翕 （497-569）, Lengjiafa 楞伽法 and Dashi 大師, and debate issues raised from the perspective of Zhanran’s critique of the Chan school. |
|---|
| 目次 | はじめに 81
傅大士の宣揚 81
楞伽の法 82
禅師と大師 83
むすびに 84 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.70.1_81 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 107 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2023.01.04 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.01.04 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
