|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
東アジアの諸註釈が論じる 『倶舎論』の全体構成：三分分別から破我別論へ=Controversy over the Structure of the Abhidharmakośa in East Asian Commentaries: From Hermeneutics to Textual History |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
一色大悟 (著)=Isshiki, Daigo (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.70 n.2 (總號=n.156) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2022.03.23 |
|---|
| ページ | 975 - 970 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 『倶舎論』; 三分分別; 破我別論; 快道 |
|---|
| 抄録 | In East Asian commentaries on the Abhidharmakośa, the issue of the structure of the text has long been controversial. Commentators have discussed the issue, known in Japanese as sanbun-funbetsu 三分分別, in the context of the hermeneutics of Xuanzang’s translation of the Abhidharmakośa. However, Kaidō快道, a Japanese scholar-monk in the Edo period, declared a new theory on the textual history of the Abhidharmakośa in the sanbun-funbetsu controversy. In this paper, I clarify that, against the background of Kaidō’s theory, the value of the Xuanzang translation changed from that of an authoritative translation of the Abhidharmakośa to one of several sources to study the original text. |
|---|
| 目次 | 1．はじめに 975
2．快道以前の三分分別 974
3．破我別論説の前提 972
4．結論 970 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.70.2_975 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 189 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2023.01.10 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.01.10 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
