|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
明清因明喻支詮釋中的誤讀與重塑 = Misreadings and Reconstruction in the Interpretations of the Example Member in Ming-Qing Buddhist Logic |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
陳帥 (著)=Chen Shuai (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
哲學與文化=Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.50 n.6 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2023.06 |
|---|
| ページ | 67 - 82 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 哲學與文化月刊雜誌社 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.umrpc.fju.edu.tw
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| ノート | 陳帥，湖南大學嶽麓書院副教授。 |
|---|
| キーワード | 因明=Buddhist Logic; 喻支=The Example Member; 明清佛教=Buddhism in Ming-Qing China; 詮釋=Interpretations; 本土化= Localization |
|---|
| 抄録 | 明清因明詮釋與印度原典之間不但存在著印漢之間的語言文化差異，更受漢傳因明傳承中斷的影響，產生了空間及時間的雙重隔閡。這些隔閡導致了明清因明學者們的諸多誤讀。例如，在喻支詮釋中，明清學者未能理解陳那理論的原本結構，也未正確繼承唐代因明「喻體」、「喻依」等概念，甚至將異喻理解成另外樹立的相反論式。他們取消了合離表述的邏輯意義，反加諸其上修辭層面的作用，使喻支僅以喻例提供類比。然而，本文認為，這些誤讀並非毫無意義，而是在一定程度上自成一體，展現了明清因明學者面對陌生原典時的理論建構努力。明清學者藉由其獨特詮釋，重塑了因明理論，將印度因明進一步本土化，其誤讀實際上與創新並不違背，是跨文化傳播的典型案例。
There were not only linguistic and cultural differences between the interpretations of Buddhist logic in Ming-Qing period and their Indian original, but also the interruption of the Chinese tradition itself. A double gap in both space and time was so created, which had led to many misreadings by Ming-Qing scholars on Buddhist logic. For instance, in their interpretations of the example member, Ming-Qing scholars failed to understand the original structure of Dignāga's theory or inherit correctly the concepts of "essence" and "substratum" of the example member from Tang Buddhist logic, and even regarded the dissimilar example as a separate and contrasting argument. They removed the logical significance from the example statements, but applied a rhetorical interpretation, thus making the example member merely serve as an analogy by instances. However, such misreadings are not meaningless but to a certain extent self-contained, showing the theoretical construction efforts of Ming-Qing scholars in the face of unfamiliar texts. Through their particular interpretations, Ming-Qing scholars reconstructed the theories of Buddhist logic, and thus further localized Indian Buddhist logic. Therefore, their misreadings are actually not contrary to innovation, but presenting a typical case of transcultural communication. |
|---|
| 目次 | 壹、前言 67
貳、《入論》中的喻支及唐代詮釋 69
參、明清因明的喻支相關詮釋 71
一、對喻支定義的解釋 71
二、對二喻表述形式的理解 73
三、對喻依、喻體的界定 75
四、新詮釋下的喻支 77
肆、結語 77
參考文獻 79 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10158383 (P); 10158383 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 38 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2023.06.28 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.06.28 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
