|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some Remarks on the Apparent Absence of a priori Reasoning in Indian Philosophy |
|
|
|
著者 |
Taber, John (著)
|
掲載誌 |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
巻号 | v.50 n.5 |
出版年月日 | 2022.11 |
ページ | 785 - 801 |
出版者 | Springer |
出版サイト |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 英文=English |
ノート | John Taber, Department of Philosophy MSC 03 2140, 1 University of New Mexico, 87131-0001, Albuquerque, NM, United States. |
キーワード | Indian epistemology; Empiricism; A priori knowledge; Reason; Kumārila; Plato |
抄録 | This essays considers the hypothesis that Indian epistemology does not clearly recognize, let alone emphasize, an intellectual faculty that apprehends intelligible things, such as essences or “truths of reason,” or elevate knowledge of such things to a status higher than that of sense perception. Evidence for this hypothesis from various sources, including Sāṃkhya, Yoga, Nyāya, and Buddhist logic-epistemological writings, is examined. Special attention is given to a passage from Kumārila’s Ślokavārttika, Pratyakṣasūtra chapter, where he argues that the senses directly perceive existence. Kumārila’s view is contrasted to Plato’s, in the Theaetetus, that existence is the object, not of the senses, but the soul (psychē). |
目次 | Abstract 785 References 800 |
ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-022-09523-3 |
ヒット数 | 80 |
作成日 | 2023.06.30 |
更新日期 | 2023.11.03 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|