|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Central Asian Buddhist Term: Remarks on Khotanese saña- and Tocharian B sāñ, A ṣāñ |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Del Tomba, Alessandro (著)
;
Maggi, Mauro (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Indo-Iranian Journal
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.64 n.3 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2021.07 |
|---|
| ページ | 199 - 240 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Brill |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.brill.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Leiden, the Netherlands [萊登, 荷蘭] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | 1. Alessandro Del Tomba
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza Italy Rome
2. Mauro Maggi
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza Italy Rome |
|---|
| キーワード | Khotanese; Tocharian; Gāndhārī; language contact; saṃjñā; upāya |
|---|
| 抄録 | The Khotanese masculine substantive saña- ‘artifice, expedient, means, method’ cannot be a loanword from the Gāndhārī feminine saṃña ‘perception, idea’ (< Sanskrit saṃjñā-), as has been recently suggested. Bilingual evidence for its meaning, its metrical use, and the contexts where it occurs show unambiguously that it differs formally and semantically from the Khotanese feminine saṃñā- ‘idea, notion, perception, etc.’, the actual loanword from Gāndhārī saṃña. Since the meaning of Tocharian B sāñ, ṣāñ and A ṣāñ ‘expedient, means’ agrees with that of Khotanese saña- ‘artifice etc.’, the old view should not be abandoned that the latter is a genuine Khotanese word < Iranian *sćandi̯a- (to the root *sćand- ‘to appear, seem (good)’) and is the source of the corresponding loanwords in Tocharian. |
|---|
| ISSN | 00197246 (P); 15728536 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1163/15728536-06402002 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 188 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2023.07.11 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.07.13 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
