|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Japanese Hossō in Relation to Silla Yogācāra in Disputes Between Nara’s Northern and Southern Temple Traditions |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Green, Ronald S. (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Journal of Korean Religions
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.11 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2020.04 |
|---|
| ページ | 97 - 121 |
|---|
| 出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | Nara Buddhism; Hossō-shū; Gomyō; Kōfukuji; Gangōji; Wŏnch’ŭk; Ryōsan; Zen’an |
|---|
| 抄録 | This paper examines the influence of writings by Silla Yogācāra Buddhists on the formation of orthodox interpretations within the Hossō tradition, Japanese Yogācāra. Part One considers the frequency of citations of Silla masters and their texts in principal Hossō writings and suggests several implications of this. Some of the Silla writings used by Hossō thinkers in support of their views were specifically condemned by the Chinese Faxiang tradition. This contradicts descriptions by Gyōnen and other historians of Hossō as an imported copy of Faxiang. Part Two of the article assesses four points of argument between the Nara Hossō Northern Temple (Kōfukuji) tradition and Nara Hossō Southern Temple (Gangōji) tradition. It is shown that these disputes persisted for centuries in Japanese Yogācāra and that the two traditions used Silla interpretations in opposing ways. Many prominent Hossō authorities relied on Silla texts that challenge Faxiang understandings of epistemology, ontology, and logic. |
|---|
| ISSN | 20937288 (P); 21672040 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1353/jkr.2020.0003 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 127 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2023.08.07 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.08.07 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
