 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Look at the Diversity of the Gzhan stong Tradition |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Burchardi, Anne (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
The Journal of the International Association of Tibetan Studies (JIATS)
|
|---|
| 巻号 | n.3 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2007.12 |
|---|
| ページ | 1 - 24 |
|---|
| 出版者 | International Association of Tibetan Studies (IATS) |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.thlib.org/collections/texts/jiats/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Virginia, US [維吉尼亞州, 美國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | Author Affiliation: University of Copenhagen, Denmark |
|---|
| 抄録 | This article introduces two studies by classical Tibetan Buddhist scholars that explain the range of meanings of the term gzhan stong. The two texts – one by Pema Bidza (twentieth century), the other by Tāranātha (1575-1634) – are analytical studies that summarize and compare the various views of previous scholars who wrote on gzhan stong. Such interpretive studies are valuable in that they present us with different ways of interpreting the heterogeneous material classified under the rubric "gzhan stong." They also suggest ways of contextualizing the different levels of discourse found within this material. |
|---|
| 目次 | 1. Introduction
2. Pema Bidza
Translation
A General Presentation of the Different Opinions
A Specific Description of the Jonang Intention
A Presentation of the Validity of the Two Kinds of Madhyamaka
a. The Differences Between the Two Types of Madhyamaka
i. Difference in Terms of Subject Matter
ii. Difference in Ascertaining
iii. Difference in Terms of Manner of Ascertainment
b. How These Two Ultimately Do Not Contradict Each Other
Analysis
3. Tāranātha
4. Conclusion
Glossary
Bibliography
Notes |
|---|
| ISSN | 15506363 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 33 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2024.04.12 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2024.10.18 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
