 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Note on the Vihāra as a Recipient of Donations in Earlier Theravāda Buddhism |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Kieffer-Pülz, Petra (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
創価大学国際仏教学高等研究所年報=Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University=ソウカ ダイガク コクサイ ブッキョウガク コウトウ ケンキュウジョ ネンポウ
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.27 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2024 |
|---|
| ページ | 29 - 40 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 創価大学・国際仏教学高等研究所 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://iriab.soka.ac.jp/publication/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 八王子, 日本 [Hachioji, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | beneficiary; cetiya; donation; donor; monk; navakamma; nun; vihāra; recipient; saṅgha; Theravāda Buddhism |
|---|
| 抄録 | In the canon of the Theravādins the recipients of donations are either the Saṅgha or individuals – monastics as well as non-monastics. In the layer of the Aṭṭhakathā commentaries in addition a vihāra (“monastery”), a cetiya (“shrine”), and navakamma (“restoration work”) are mentioned. Their introduction mainly serves the purpose of enabling monastics to
navigate certain rules relating to the economic activity of the Saṅgha, primarily to accept objects not allowed (akappiya) to the monastics. Among these three recipients the vihāra became the most prominent showing that fully developed monasteries with monastic communities residing in them for quite long periods had by then become so prominent that
they could function as legal substitute for the Buddhist Saṅgha. |
|---|
| 目次 | Aṭṭhakathā layer 34
Conclusions 38
Acknowledgement: 38
Abbreviations: 38
References: 39 |
|---|
| ISSN | 13438980 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 124 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2024.05.24 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2024.07.12 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
