|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
再び『金剛經解義』の成立を論ず=Reconsideration of the Establishment of Huineng’s Commentary on the Diamond Sūtra 金剛經解義 |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
伊吹敦 (著)=Ibuki, Atsushi (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.72 n.1 (總號=n.161) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2023.12.20 |
|---|
| ページ | 278 - 271 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 慧能; 荷澤宗; 『金剛経解義』; 『壇経』; 『南陽和尚問答雑徴義』 |
|---|
| 抄録 | Concerning the establishment of the Jingangjing jieyi 金剛經解義 （Z 459）, which has been said to have been written by Liuzu Huineng 六祖慧能, I once published my conclusion that it was compiled in the end of the 8th or the beginning of the 9th century by the Heze School 荷澤宗, by comparing its terminology and ideas with various Heze School writings. The basis of the examination was my own theory of the gradual establishment of the Platform Sūtra 六祖壇經.
In recent years, however, I have abandoned this theory and expressed new views on the establishments of works of Heze Shenhui 荷澤神會 and the Heze school. In this article I reexamine this issue based on a new premise, and reconfirme the previous conclusion. |
|---|
| 目次 | はじめに 278
1．『解義』と荷澤宗文獻の比較 277
2．「覺照」の語義の變化と『解義』の成立時期 274
3．『解義』の編輯時期とその目的 272
〈略号及び一次文献〉 271
（一次文献） 271
（二次文献） 271 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.72.1_278 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 58 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2024.12.04 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2024.12.25 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
