|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consequentialism, Agent-Neutrality, and Mahayana Ethics |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Goodman, Charles
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Philosophy East and West
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.58 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2008.01 |
|---|
| ページ | 17 - 35 |
|---|
| 出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 抄録 | What kinds of comparisons can legitimately be made between Mahāyāna Buddhism and Western ethical theories? Mahāyānists aspire to alleviate the suffering, promote the happiness, and advance the moral perfection of all sentient beings. This aspiration is best understood as expressing a form of universalist consequentialism. Many Indian Mahāyāna texts seem committed to claims about agent-neutrality that imply consequentialism and are not compatible with virtue ethics. Within the Mahāyāna tradition, there is some diversity of views: Asaṅga seems to hold a complex and interesting version of rule consequentialism, whereas Śāntideva is closer to act consequentialism. |
|---|
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2008.0013 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 1622 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2007.12.13 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2019.05.17 |
|---|
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
