 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contradiction in Buddhist Argumentation |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Siderits, Mark (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Argumentation
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.22 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2008.03 |
|---|
| ページ | 125 - 133 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Springer |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://link.springer.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Dordrecht, the Netherlands [多德雷赫特, 荷蘭] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | Contradiction; Dialetheism; Nagarjuna; Madhyamaka; Tetralemma; Reduction |
|---|
| 抄録 | Certain Buddhist texts contain statements that are prima facie contradictions. The scholarly consensus has been that such statements are meant to serve a rhetorical function that depends on the apparent contradictions being resolvable. But recently it has been claimed that such statements are meant to be taken literally: their authors assert as true statements that are of the form ‘p and not p’. This claim has ramifications for our understanding of the role played by the principle of non-contradiction in Buddhist argumentation. I argue that these make the claim less plausible. |
|---|
| 目次 | References 133 |
|---|
| ISSN | 0920427X (P); 15728374 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10503-007-9073-8 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 422 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2008.03.25 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.03.22 |
|---|
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
