|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buddhist Narratives of the Great Debates |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Cabezon, Jose Ignacio
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Argumentation
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.22 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2008.03 |
|---|
| ページ | 71 - 92 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Springer |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://link.springer.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Dordrecht, the Netherlands [多德雷赫特, 荷蘭] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | India; Tibet; Debate; Narrative; Argumentation; Magic; Scholasticism; Identity formation |
|---|
| 抄録 | Western scholars have written on the theory of Buddhist argumentation. They have also analyzed examples of arguments found in philosophical and polemical writing. However, little has been written to date about what might have transpired when Buddhists and their opponents met in face-to-face debates in classical India. Drawing on Chinese and Tibetan historical and biographical writings about famous Indian debates, this essay analyzes the structure and conventions of these accounts as a literary form. While it is difficult to assess the historicity of particular narratives, an analysis of this literature as a whole gives us clues about what might have occurred when Indian scholars faced their adversaries in live debates. These sources provide us with a picture of the etiquette, rules of engagement, and strategies that may have been used in such encounters. They also suggest what constituted defeat in ancient Indian verbal contests, and they point to some of the real-political and material benefits of victory. The essay ends by reflecting on the function of these narratives vis-à-vis Tibetan Buddhist scholastic identity. |
|---|
| 目次 | 1 Introduction 72
2 Narratives of the Great Debates 73
3 Conclusions 88
References 91 |
|---|
| ISSN | 0920427X (P); 15728374 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 771 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2008.03.25 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.03.22 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
