|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indian Views of the Buddhist Laity: Precepts and Upasaka Status |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Agostini, Giulio (著)
|
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2002 |
|---|
| 出版者 | UMI: ProQuest Information and Learning |
|---|
| 出版地 | Ann Arbor, MI, US [安娜堡, 密西根州, 美國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 其他=Others |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 学位 | 博士 |
|---|
| 学校 | University of California, Berkeley |
|---|
| 指導教官 | Jaini, Padmanabh S. |
|---|
| 卒業年 | 2002 |
|---|
| ノート | 282p |
|---|
| キーワード | 尸羅=戒=command=Precept=sila=morality=rule=discipline=prohibition; 佛教人物=Buddhist; 佛教宗派=Buddhist Sects=Buddhist Schools |
|---|
| 抄録 | In this dissertation I examine the definition of Buddhist 'lay brother' ( upasaka ) in ancient India. I mainly draw on canonical and post-canonical texts of philosophy and monastic discipline belonging to various Buddhist schools. Firstly, I show how some schools maintained that lay brothers should take all five precepts, others maintained that lay brothers should take one to five precepts, and others maintained that lay brothers should not be required to take any precepts. Secondly, I present and discuss evidence on those lay Buddhists who were not 'lay brothers' and who were not even eligible to reach such a status, e.g. butchers, kings, and eunuchs. The Buddhist clergy encouraged all these people to participate in the ritual of the weekly fast. Thirdly, I show how some Buddhists related to the Mahasam ghika school maintained that abortion, a grave infringement of the first precept, does not entail loss of upasaka or monastic status. Finally, I present an edition and translation of an Indian text on Buddhist lay persons extant in Tibetan, the Upasakasam varas[dotbelow]t[dotbelow]aka and its commentary, the Upasakasam varas[dotbelow]t[dotbelow]akavivaran[dotbelow]a, both written by Sunayasri. |
|---|
| ISBN | 9780493821344 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 813 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2008.04.17 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.03.22 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
