|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
論三論宗從學派到宗的歷程=The progress of San-lun school from the sect to the school |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
藍日昌 (著)=Lan, Jih-chang (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
世界宗教學刊=Journal of World Religions
|
|---|
| 巻号 | n.6 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2005.12.01 |
|---|
| ページ | 85 - 134 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 南華大學宗教學研究所 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://rel3.nhu.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 嘉義縣, 臺灣 [Chia-i hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| ノート | 作者為弘光科技大學通識教育中心副教授 |
|---|
| キーワード | 三論宗=san-lun school; 宗派=faction, sect of Buddhism; 吉藏=Ji-tzang; 祖師; 八宗綱要=Ba-tzung Gung-yau |
|---|
| 抄録 | 以《中論》《百論》《十二門論》為主的三論教學在隋唐之時甚為活躍，甚至一度曾為南方佛學研究的代表者，中國佛教史通常以三論宗稱呼這一僧團，並定出這一僧團的祖統及發展過程。然而唐宋之時，並未見有何討論這一宗派者，三論宗一詞皆專指這三部論書的宗旨，並未出現宗派義的三論宗。當法相學、天台學、華嚴學及禪學相繼活躍於南北之時，三論學者卻已消聲了，以致於宋人的論述中根本不認為有所謂的三論宗這一宗派，顯然對於三論教學的發展，古人與現代人的認知是有差距的。以資料所見，宗派義的三論宗首出於十三世紀之時的日本僧人凝然的著作《八宗綱要鈔》，並定下三論宗的祖統說，在日本的佛教史中是有三論宗這一宗派，並據而定出印度及中國的三論宗祖統說。也就是說唐宋以下的中國僧傳的資料中並未見三論宗這一宗派，但同時的日本僧傳卻定出三論宗這一宗派的發展史。
The teaching of San-lun, including Mulamadhyamaka-karika(中論)、Catacastra(百論)、Dvadacamukha-castra(十二門論), had been active in SHU-TANG dynasty, and it was once regarded as a typical representative of southern Buddhism's teaching. The Buddhism history of Chinese generally named the monks groups as San-lun school and arranged the order of masters. But San-lun school had never been discussed in Tang-Sung dynasty. The words, San-lun, indicate the purpose of the classical.
When the monks of Fa-shiang school、Hua-yen school、Tian-tai schooland Chan school active at northern and sour then of China in Tang-Sung dynasty, the monks of San-lun school disappeared silently. As a result, the works of scholars in Sung dynasty seemed never to know what San-lun school was, not mentioned the order of masters. Therefore, the understanding of the development of San-lun 's teaching has not fallen into the same treat between then and now.
According to Japan's Buddhism history, the San-lun school firstly definite as a school and arranged the order of masters at Ba-tzung Gung-yau (八宗綱要) that work belonged to a Japanese monk, Nen-ran (凝然) in 13th century. But at the same time it was in Tang-Sung dynasty in China.
The essay aims at realizing that the discussion of San-lun school has been influenced by Japan's history and it has never appeared at Chinese Buddhism history after Tang dynasty.
|
|---|
| 目次 | 一、前言 87
二、與宗派的定義不合的宗派 89
三、三論教學的發展 97
四、奇特的祖譜 100
五、果真有三論宗這一宗派嗎 108
(一)隋唐之時的「三論宗」一磁專指三論之學的旨趣而言 108
(二)三論教學的活動中並未存有繼祖傳燈之舉 111
(三)吉藏兼弘三論語法華之學 114
(四)唐中葉以後，三論教學活動顯趨於弱勢 117
六、三論宗成為宗派之稱首出日本 120
附錄 127
參考文獻 128
|
|---|
| ISSN | 1728645X (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 738 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2009.10.16 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2017.11.07 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
