![](jp/images/title/Title_FulltextSearch.gif) |
|
|
|
著者 |
吳汝鈞
|
掲載誌 |
華岡佛學學報=Hwakang Buddhist Journal
|
巻号 | n.7 |
出版年月日 | 1984.09 |
ページ | 101 - 111 |
出版者 | 中華學術院佛學研究所 |
出版サイト |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/
|
出版地 | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 中文=Chinese |
ノート | 作者為本所研究員 |
キーワード | 龍樹=龍樹=Nagarjuna=kLu-sgrub; 緣生法; 空; 假名; 中道; 自性; 二諦 |
抄録 | 本文在論龍樹「空」中有「假」,「中」兩個概念. 作 者認為龍樹之原文並未把空,假,中,放在平行位置,所以 「中道」有不同于空處.
其次,本文指出中論之空,假,中思想對天台三諦三觀 及華嚴之圓融思想均有相當之影響. 但龍樹則主「見因緣 法」;又主「業煩惱,滅故」才能「見佛」,「名之為解脫 」. 而天台則已更明白地指出:「生死即隉槃」,「煩惱即 菩提」,更能契合般若思想.
本文同時亦對中論「真諦」與「俗諦」之相即不離之關 係指出:即是同一外延,同一範圍. 隉槃與世間互為外延, 因之,隉槃不即是世間,世間亦不即是隉槃.. 對龍樹說, 須煩惱滅故才能見佛. 亦可見中論之空,假,中不是相等的 關係.
This paper is a discussion on `Nagarjuna's` idea that in the void there are the temporal and the mean. The author thinks that `Nagarjuna's` work does not put the void,the temporal,and the mean in a parallel position,and that the "middle way" is different from the void.
Secondly,the paper points out that the ideas of the void,the temporal,and the mean have considerable influence on the T'ien-t'ai philosophy of three truths or three insights and on the Hua-en philosophy of totality,but there are differences between them. `Nagarjuna` advocates the realization of dependent origination. He claims that only after the elimination of defilements can one "see the Buddha, "which means obtaining liberation. The T'ien-t'ai School,however,clearly states that samsara is `nirvana`,that defilement is enlightment ,which better fits the `prajna` philosophy.
The relationship between the absolute truth and the conventional truth as discussed in the `Madhyamika Sastra` is also treated. |
目次 | 一、空假中偈 103 二、空與性 104 三、假名 105 四、中道 106 五、二論 108 六、兩諦不離 110
|
ヒット数 | 1367 |
作成日 | 1998.07.22
|
更新日期 | 2017.08.23 |
![](jp/images/logo/bg-btn-edit.png)
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|