|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theravada Buddhism and morality：objections andcorrections [reply to R H Jones 47,371-387 S 79] |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Reat, Noble Ross
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.48 n.3 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 1980.09 |
|---|
| ページ | 433 - 440 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Oxford University Press |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Oxford, UK [牛津, 英國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | 300
|
|---|
| キーワード | 上座部佛教=南傳佛教=Theravada Buddhism |
|---|
| 抄録 | The present paper is a response to the article "Theravāda Buddhism and Morality," by Richard H. Jones, which appeared in the September 1979 issue of the "Journal of the American Academy of Religion". Defining morality as consisting, in essence, of regard for the welfare of others, Jones argues that both the teachings of Theravāda Buddhism and the people who follow these teachings are nonmoral because, he claims, they lack this regard for others. In the course of attempting to establish this thesis, he distorts or ignores much important scriptural and anthropological material. The present refutation consists primarily of a reconsideration of material Jones has used carelessly and inaccurately, and a consideration of a sampling of the important material he has ignored. Space does not permit correction of Jones's misunderstanding of several basic Buddhist concepts, most notably, karma, mental purification, and enlightenment; but it is hoped that the following brief remarks will serve to clarify and correct: 1) Jones's misunderstanding of scholarly work on the definition of morality; 2) his misapplication of this misunderstanding to Theravāda Buddhism; and 3) his misrepresentation of Theravāda Buddhist scriptures and people.
|
|---|
| ISSN | 00027189 (P); 14774585 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 196 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 1998.04.28
|
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2019.12.25 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
