|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
試論牟宗三對天台智顗「不斷斷」思想之詮釋=An Investigation into Mou Zongsan's Interpretation of Tiantai Zhi-yi's Concept of "the Extinction of Un-Extinction" |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
林建德=Lin, Kent Chien-te
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
玄奘佛學研究=Hsuan Chuang Journal of Buddhism Studies
|
|---|
| 巻号 | n.13 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2010.03.01 |
|---|
| ページ | 29 - 54 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 玄奘大學 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://ird.hcu.edu.tw/front/bin/home.phtml
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 新竹市, 臺灣 [Hsinchu shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| ノート | 本期為天台學專輯；作者為佛教慈濟大學宗教與文化研究所助理教授=Assistant Professor, Institute of Religion and Culture, Buddhist Tzu Chi University |
|---|
| キーワード | 牟宗三=Mou Zongsan; 不斷斷=the Extinction of Un-Extinction; 詭譎=Changeful; 圓實說=Consummate and Truthful Teaching; 隨宜說=Flexible Measures |
|---|
| 抄録 | 本文探討牟宗三《佛性與般若》一書，對於天台智者「不斷斷」之詮釋。首先論述牟宗三所認為的智顗之原初洞見，接著分析牟宗三對「不斷斷」概念之解讀，最後再對牟宗三之詮解作一檢討與反省。對於牟宗三所闡釋的「不斷斷」，本文認為此一概念，應是為符合天台圓教義理系統之論述而來，已帶有一定的預設；即智顗應是先有圓教之觀點，再以「不斷斷」之提出，使其成為圓教的要件之一。此外，牟
宗三認為「煩惱即菩提」等語句，乃是「不斷斷」之理境，但此理境是否可理解為圓實說，可能有不同的看法，如在其它的大乘經典即指出此為對治之用的隨宜說；而且其中隨宜的對治作用，若理解與運用不當，也易於產生負面之效應。
This paper discusses Mou Zongsan’s interpretation of Tiantai Zhi-yi’s concept of “the Extinction of Un-Extinction” as treated in his book Buddha Nature and Perfection of Wisdom. At the outset, Mou Zongsan’s presentation of Tiantai Zhi-yi’s original insights is introduced and subsequently, his understanding of Zhi-yi’s idea of “the Extinction of Un-Extinction” is analyzed. The paper then concludes with a critical reflection upon Mou Zongsan’s interpretation of “the Extinction of Un-Extinction”. In this paper, I attempt to point out that the concept of “the Extinction of Un-Extinction” is meant to cohere with Tiantai’s theoretical structure of the “Consummate Teaching” and furthermore has its own inherent presupposetion -- it appears as though Zhi-yi gives rise to the viewpoint of consummate teaching first, and thereupon develops his interpretation of “the Extinction of Un-Extinction” as one of the necessary conditions of the “Consummate Teaching.” Discord with Mou Zongsan’s interpretation, this paper also examines the validity of the claim that “Vexation is Bodhi” belongs to the very same theoretical domain as “the Extinction of Un-Extinction.” Doubt is raised over whether sayings such as “Vexation is Bodhi” or “the Extinction of Un-Extinction” could rightfully be considered a “Consummate and Truthful Teaching.” For instance, other Mahayana sutras treat this claim as being merely a kind of Flexible Measures” intended to cure mental afflictions. Moreover, such a temporary treatment tends to have negative effects if misunderstood or applied inappropriately. |
|---|
| 目次 | 一、前言
二、牟宗三論智顗之原初洞見
（一）智者以《法華經》為宗
（二）智者之原初洞見
三、牟宗三「不斷斷」概念之詮釋
四、牟宗三「不斷斷」說之檢視
五、結語
|
|---|
| ISSN | 18133649 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 611 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2010.08.06 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2017.12.08 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
