|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
《金瓶梅》毒書說、誣陷仇人與佛經故事=View of "a Poisonous Book" on Jin Ping Mei, Frame One’s Personal Enemy and Sutra Stories |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
王立 (著)=Wang, Li
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
徐州教育學院學報=Journal of Xuzhou Education College
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.18 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2003.03 |
|---|
| ページ | 28 - 30 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 徐州教育學院 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.xznu.edu.cn/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 徐州, 中國 [Xuzhou, China] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| キーワード | 《金瓶梅》=Jin Ping Mei; 復仇文化=Revenge culture; 母題=Motif; 復仇方式=Way of revenge; 佛經故事=Sutra stories |
|---|
| 抄録 | 有關《金瓶梅》毒書復仇說的產生並非偶然。在對待「投毒」這一復仇方式由誤讀、接受到容受、認同的觀念演進過程中，表現出華夏中土倫理性支配力的逐漸弱化，對於功利性———復仇目標實現的關注漸趨強化。毒藥復仇與誣陷復仇，這一復仇方式與復仇者本身的某種質性及其相關的文化觀念是相符的。《金瓶梅》的接受以及相關續書的生成流傳過程中，陸續變化增殖的復仇觀念介入其中，不僅為小說結撰情節發揮作用，也通過相關描寫為古代復仇文化觀念及其在敘事文學中的豐富表現，起到了巨大的審美效應
It is not a casual matter that the view of "a poisonous book" on Jin Ping Mei appears. Views on the way of poisonous revenge experienced a misunderstanding, accepting, tolerating and identifying period, which demonstrated a lowering ethical supporting power of china and an upping attention on the revenge object-utility. Poisonous revenge and framing one’s personal enemy to revenge accord with some character of avengers and some correlative cultural opinions. During the acceptance of Jin Ping Mei and creating and coming down of its correlative continuous novels, continuous changing and revenge ideas are added, which plays a role not only in adapting novels ,but also adding a lot of aesthetic power into ancient revenge cultural ideas and representing in narrative literature colorfully by some rendering. |
|---|
| ISSN | 10086625 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 297 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2014.10.07 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2020.04.17 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
