|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dependent Arising, Non-arising, and the Mind: MMK1 and the Abhidharma |
|
|
|
著者 |
Salvini, Mattia
|
掲載誌 |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
巻号 | v.42 n.4 |
出版年月日 | 2014.09 |
ページ | 471 - 497 |
出版者 | Springer |
出版サイト |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 英文=English |
ノート | M. Salvini (&) Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand e-mail: prasajya@gmail.com |
キーワード | Madhyamaka; Philosophy of mind; Nāgārjuna; Akutobhayā; Buddhapālita; Bhāviveka; Candrakīrti; Vasubandhu; Abhidharma; Buddhist philosophy |
抄録 | The first Chapter of Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā offers a critique of causation that includes the Abhidharmic category of the ‘four conditions’. Following the South-Asian commentarial tradition, this article discusses the precise relationship between Madhyamaka philosophy and its fundamental Abhidharmic background. What comes to light is a more precise assessment of Madhyamaka ideas about viable conventions, understood as the process of dependent arising. Since this is primarily in the sense of conceptual dependence, it involves sentiency as a necessary causal element, and the relationship between sentiency and conceptuality is highlighted by Nāgārjuna and his commentators. Viable conventions exclude the possibility of a non-contingent core, and the systems and categories that revolve around such non-contingent element (ātman) are discarded by the Madhyamaka even at a conventional level. |
目次 | Conditions (pratyayas) and Causes (hetus) The Abhidharmakośabhāṣya on the Four Conditions Nāgārjuna and His Commentators, on the Defining Traits of the Four Conditions The Akutobhayā The Buddhapālitavṛtti The Prajñāpradīpa The Prasannapadā Candrakīrti on Buddhist vs. Non-Buddhist definitions (lakṣaṇa) Conclusions References |
ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
ヒット数 | 250 |
作成日 | 2014.12.31 |
更新日期 | 2019.07.29 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|