|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legends and Transcendence: Sectarian Affiliations of the Ekottarika Āgama in Chinese Translation |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Kuan, Tse-fu
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Journal of the American Oriental Society
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.133 n.4 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2013.10-12 |
|---|
| ページ | 607 - 634 |
|---|
| 出版者 | American Oriental Society |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.umich.edu/~aos/index.html
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Ann Arbor, MI, US [安娜堡, 密西根州, 美國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | Author Affiliations: YUAN ZE UNIVERSITY, TAIWAN |
|---|
| キーワード | BUDDHISM; BODHISATTVA (The concept); TRANSLATIONS; CHINESE language; TRANSCENDENCE (Philosophy) |
|---|
| 抄録 | Of the four complete Āgama collections, the Ekottarika Āgama (E Ā ) has generated the most controversy about whether it can be attributed to any early Buddhist school and, if so, which school it could belong to. This paper examines the various hypotheses about the sectarian affiliation(s) of the E Ā . It shows that a considerable part of this corpus is likely to be of Mahāsāṃghika derivation, and that the EĀ contains numerous salient features of Mahāsāṃghika doctrine, particularly the transcendence of Buddhas and Bodhisattvas. This study also argues that the seeming affinity between several legends in the EĀ and those in the Mũlasarvāstivāda Vinaya is likely to have resulted from Mahāsāṃghika influence on the Mülasarvāstivādins. The Mahāsāṃghika hypothesis for the school affiliation of the EĀ is substantially strengthened in this inquiry while the others are shown to be probably untenable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|
| 目次 | INTRODUCTION
VALIDITY OF ATTRIBUTING THE ÄGAMAS TO SPECIFIC SCHOOLS
SARVÄSTIVÄDA
MÜLASARVÄSTIVÄDA OR MAHÄSÄMGHIKA?
MÜLASARVÄSTIVÄDA AND MAHÄSÄMGHIKA
MAHÄSÄMGHIKA
DHARMAGUPTAKA
CONCLUSION
ABBREVIATIONS
REFERENCES |
|---|
| ISSN | 00030279 (P); 21692289 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 434 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2015.01.20 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2019.11.04 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
