|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Compassionate Killing and the Abhidhamma’s “Psychological Ethics” |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Keown, Damien
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Journal of Buddhist Ethics
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.23 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2016 |
|---|
| ページ | 46 - 82 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Department of History & Religious Studies Program , The Pennsylvania State University |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://history.la.psu.edu/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | University Park, PA, US |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | Keown, Damien (University of London Goldsmiths) |
|---|
| 抄録 | Is compassionate killing really psychologically impossible, as the Abhidhammaclaims? Previously I discussed a Vinayacase that seemed to show the contrary. Reviewing my conclusions in the light of commentarial literature, Rupert Gethin disagreed and restated the Abhidhammaposition that killing can never be motivated by compassion. This paper supports my original conclusions and argues further that the Vinayacase reveals underlying problems with the Abhidhamma’s“psychological ethics.” |
|---|
| 目次 | [Table of Contents]
Introduction p.238
Motive and Intent p.48
I. The Vinaya Case p.50
The death of the sick monk
The commentarial exegesis
Reflections on the commentary
Corroborating evidence
II. Why is Compassionate Killing Impossible? p.58
Reason 1: death presents a special opportunity
Reason 2: refusal to face the reality of suffering
Reason 3: self-deception
Reason 4: the alternative approach
Reason 5: a psycho-ethical puzzle
III. Abhidhammam Action Theory p.67
Vinaya v Abhidhamma
Motivation
IV. The Classification of Actions “By Root” (CBR) p.72
An anomaly: harsh speech
Mahāyāna ethics
Conclusion p.77
Bibliography p.80 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10769005 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 402 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2016.03.21 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2017.07.13 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
