サイトマップ本館について諮問委員会お問い合わせ資料提供著作権について当サイトの内容を引用するホームページへ        

書目仏学著者データベース当サイト内
検索システム全文コレクションデジタル仏経言語レッスンリンク
 


加えサービス
書誌管理
書き出し
The Denial Of the World From an Impartial View
著者 Contestabile, Bruno
掲載誌 Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal
巻号v.17 n.1
出版年月日2016.05
ページ49 - 61
出版者Routledge
出版サイト https://www.routledge.com/
出版地Abingdon, UK [阿賓登, 英國]
資料の種類期刊論文=Journal Article
言語英文=English
ノート1. Includes bibliographical references;
2. Full text available from https://www.socrethics.com/Folder2/WorldDenial.htm
キーワードMetaphor; Reincarnation; Satisfaction; Game Theory; Maximin Strategies; Contingency (Philosophy) Psychological Aspects
抄録Starting point: The core idea of secular Buddhism is to grasp the spirit of early Buddhism and transpose it into the present. The best known approach to implement this idea is Stephen Batchelor’s Buddhism Without Beliefs, an approach which advocates an agnostic stance with regard to the doctrine of rebirth and denies its relevance for daily practice.

Type of problem:
Is there a way to revise the doctrine of rebirth, instead of completely dropping it?
What is the impact on the notion of justice?

Result: The doctrine of rebirth cannot be revised in a strict sense, but there are some striking similarities between the ancient and modern (biological) view on the topic. Since the stream of genetic and epigenetic information has the power to create consciousness and reflects experiences of past lives, it can be associated with the stream of consciousness (cittasantāna) in the Mahayana model of rebirth. Parents not only determine the genetic constitution of their children, they also transfer character traits by means of epigenetic heredity. If genetic inheritance is associated with karma, then genes become an element of synchronic and diachronic connectedness (pratītya-samutpāda). Instead of an individual learning process across successive lives, there is a collective learning process across successive generations.

Given the biological model of rebirth, the belief in cosmic justice turns into a quest for mundane justice. There is a thought experiment for constructing such a concept, which complies well with the secular Buddhist spirit. John Rawls assumes that the legislative deliberation is taking place ‘behind a veil of ignorance’, so that the participants of the deliberation do not know their future genetic constitution and their future position within the society. If the participants imagine that their future self is contingent and impermanent – in accordance with the Buddhist doctrine of anātman and anitya – then the resulting principles of justice will be impartial.
ISSN14639947 (P); 14767953 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2018.1442144
ヒット数231
作成日2016.09.30
更新日期2022.05.17



Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。

注意:

この先は にアクセスすることになります。このデータベースが提供する全文が有料の場合は、表示することができませんのでご了承ください。

修正のご指摘

下のフォームで修正していただきます。正しい情報を入れた後、下の送信ボタンを押してください。
(管理人がご意見にすぐ対応させていただきます。)

シリアル番号
568720

検索履歴
フィールドコードに関するご説明
検索条件ブラウズ