|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
“Apūrva,” “Devatā,” and “Svarga”: Arguments On Words Denoting Imperceptible Objects |
|
|
|
著者 |
Unebe, Toshiya (著)
|
掲載誌 |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
巻号 | v.39 n.4-5 |
出版年月日 | 2011.10 |
ページ | 535 - 552 |
出版者 | Springer |
出版サイト |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 英文=English |
ノート | Author Affiliations: Department of Indian Studies, Graduate School of Letters, Nagoya University Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan |
キーワード | Bhartṛhari; Kumārila; Apūrva; Sattā; Atyantāparidṛṣṭa |
抄録 | We cannot directly perceive and experience objects of words such as "apūrva" "devatā," and "svarga," while objects of words such as "cow" and "horse" are perceptible. Therefore in the Indian linguistic context, some assert that there are two categories of words. However, a grammarian philosopher Bhartṛhari (450 CE) in the second book of his Vākyapadīya, introduces a verse stating that there is no difference between them. Other Indian thinkers as well deal with this issue in various contexts. This paper aims at exploring the ideas expressed in Bhartṛhari's verse and the related arguments found in other treatises of different schools. It consists of discussions of the following: (1) Bhartṛhari's Vākyapadīya 2.119 and its commentarial texts; (2) Kumārila's Criticism; (3) The Nyāya context; (4) The Sāṃkhya and the Buddhist context; (5) Related grammatical passages and the background of the Vākyapadīya 2.119; and (6) Conclusion. |
目次 | Bhartrhari’s Vakyapadıya 2.119 and Its Commentarial Texts 536 Kumarila’s Criticism 539 The Nyaya Context 542 The Samkhya and the Buddhist Context 544 Related Grammatical Passages and the Background of the VP 2.119 546 Conclusion 549 |
ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
DOI | 10.1007/s10781-011-9134-z |
ヒット数 | 313 |
作成日 | 2019.10.11 |
更新日期 | 2023.10.18 |

|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|