サイトマップ本館について諮問委員会お問い合わせ資料提供著作権について当サイトの内容を引用するホームページへ        

書目仏学著者データベース当サイト内
検索システム全文コレクションデジタル仏経言語レッスン博物館リンク
 


加えサービス
書誌管理
書き出し
Three Senses of Atomic Accumulation — An Interpretation Of Vasubandhu’s Viṃśikā Stanzas 12–13 In Light Of the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya and Dharmapāla’s Dasheng Guangbailun Shilun
著者 Keng, Ching (著)
掲載誌 Journal of Indian Philosophy
巻号v.47 n.3
出版年月日2019.07
ページ565 - 601
出版者Springer
出版サイト http://www.springer.com/gp/
出版地Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國]
資料の種類期刊論文=Journal Article
言語英文=English
ノートAuthor Affiliations: National Chengchi University, No. 64, Sec. 2, ZhiNan Rd, Wenshan District, Taipei 11605, Taiwan
キーワードAbhidharmakośabhāṣya; Dharmapāla’s Dasheng Guangbailun Shilun
抄録Vasubandhu’s Twenty Stanzas (Viṃśikā) is among the most influential anti-Realist philosophical treatises in the history of Indian Buddhism. In particular, his refutation of the theories about the accumulation of atoms (paramāṇu) in stanza 12 if often regarded as compelling or even conclusive. But if this is the case, then the transition from stanza 12 to 13 would seem very odd, because in stanza 13 Vasubandhu bothers himself with yet another version of atomic accumulation. In this paper, I give an interpretation of stanzas 12–13 by drawing clues from the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya and Dharmapāla’s Dasheng guangbailun shilun (Taishō 1571). I argue that Vasubandhu’s refutation in stanza 12 is valid only if we assume that the only possible way atoms can accumulate is by means of physical contacts with neighboring atoms. Conversely, if the opponents do not accept this assumption, then Vasubandhu’s refutation would miss its target. Given that stanza 13 cites the theory of the Kāśmīravaibhāṣikas and seeks to refute it, we must interpret that the Kāśmīravaibhāṣikas hold that atoms can form an accumulation in which atoms do not come into physical contact with each other, because this would be the only way to deal with the challenge previously posed in stanza 12. Dharmapāla provides more details about this theory and seeks to refute it again. Assuming the same Vasubandhu to be the author of Abhidharmakośabhāṣya, in which the author deals with the same issue, we must judge that Vasubandhu himself is quite aware of the limitations of his refutation in stanza 12, and this explains why he feels the need to devote stanza 13 to further refuting the theory of the Kāśmīravaibhāṣikas. However, I also argue that Vasubandhu’s refutation of this theory fails. If my argument holds, then we must conclude that the refutation of the accumulation of atoms in the Twenty Stanzas may not be successful. This explains, at least in part, why Dignāga feels the need to find new arguments in his Ālambanaparīkṣā.
目次Abstract 565
Introduction 566
A Set of Terms Concerning the Ways Atoms Accumulate 569
Vasubandhu’s Refutation of Theories of Atoms in Stanzas 12–15: A Brief Review 570
Questions and Problems in the Transition from 12–13 571
Clues About Accumulation3 from AKBh 577
Further Clues from Dharmapāla’s DGS 579
TEXT: DGS in Light of Wengui’s Commentary 581
References
Primary Sources 600
Secondary Sources 601
ISSN00221791 (P); 15730395 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-019-09399-w
ヒット数17
作成日2019.10.24
更新日期2022.10.18



Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。

注意:

この先は にアクセスすることになります。このデータベースが提供する全文が有料の場合は、表示することができませんのでご了承ください。

修正のご指摘

下のフォームで修正していただきます。正しい情報を入れた後、下の送信ボタンを押してください。
(管理人がご意見にすぐ対応させていただきます。)

シリアル番号
588411

検索履歴
フィールドコードに関するご説明
検索条件ブラウズ