|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
倶舎論根品心不相応行論 — 世親本論と諸註釈の和訳研究(5) —=On Cittaviprayuktasaṃskāra in the Abhidharmakośa, Chapter II —An Annotated Japanese Translation of the Abhidharmakośa and Its Commentaries (5)— |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
那須良彦 (著)=Nasu, Yoshihiko (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
インド学チベット学研究=Journal of Indian and Tibetan Studies=インドガク チベットガク ケンキュウ
|
|---|
| 巻号 | n.15 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2011.12 |
|---|
| ページ | 68 - 96 |
|---|
| 出版者 | インド哲学研究会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jits-ryukoku.net/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 京都, 日本 [Kyoto, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| ノート | 作者單位：龍谷大学非常勤講師 |
|---|
| キーワード | 倶舎論; 世親; 称友; 安慧; 満増; 心不相応行; 衆同分; 同分 |
|---|
| 抄録 | 本稿は、世親（Vasubandhu, 400-480 頃）が著した『阿毘達磨倶舎論本頌』（Abhidharmakośakārikā, abbr. AK）、世親自註『阿毘達磨倶舎釈論』（Abhidharmakośabhāṣya, abbr. AKBh）、それに対 する称友（Yaśomitra）の註『阿毘達磨倶舎論註明瞭義』（Sphutārthā Abhidharmakośavyākhyā, abbr. AKV）、および安慧（Sthiramati,480-540 頃）の註『阿毘達磨倶舎釈論疏真実義』（*Abhidharmakośabhāsyatīkā Tattvārthānāma, abbr. AKTA）のうち、心不相応行（cittaviprayuktasamskarā）の 部分に対する訳註研究であり、『インド学チベット学研究』14 に提出したものの続編である。底本や略号は前稿を引き継ぐ。本稿で新たに用いる略号および参考文献は末尾に記した。
This is an annotated Japanese translation of the homogeneous character in Vasubandhu’s Abhidharmakośabhāsya, Yasomitra’s Sphutārthā Abhidharmakośavyākhyā and Sthiramati’s Tattvārthā Abhidharmakośabhāsyatīkā. With regard to Purnavardhana’s Laksanānusārinī Abhidharmakośatīkā, I have noted only the passages that differ from Sthiramati’s Tattvārthā.
A homogeneous character of the group(nikāyasabhāga), alias a homogeneous character(sabhāgatā) belongs to the conditioned forces dissociated from thought(cittaviprayuktasamskāra). In the Sarvastivada-Abhidharma texts and the Abhidharmakośa it is defined as the generality of sentient beings. The homogeneous character of sentient beings is also divided into a general homogeneous character(abhinnā sabh āgatā) and a specific homogeneous character(bhinnāsabhāgatā) in the Abhidharmakośabhāsya. The general homogeneous character is generality of all sentient beings. The specific homogeneous character is generality found in particular groups of similar kind. The Sarvastivāda Vaibhāsikas insist that the homogeneous character exists as a real entity (dravyatośti). The Sautrantikas, however deny the real existence of the homogeneous character. The Sautrantikas criticize the theory of the real existence of homogeneous character by presenting six objections to the Sarvastiv āda Vaibhāsikas in the Abhidharmakośabhāsya: (1)Since a homogeneous character of an ordinary person(prthagjanasabhāgatā) and a nature of an ordinary person(prthagjanatva) are same, the latter is useless; (2)Since the homogeneous character cannot be known by direct perception or inference, the homogeneous character does not exists as a real entity; (3)Since there is a commonality to insentient objects, why is not it admitted that the homogeneous character exists in insentient objects？; (4)The theory of the real existence of the homogeneous character involves the Sarvastivāda Vaibhāsikas in the fault that there is the homogeneous character on the homogeneous character; (5)The Theory of the homogeneous character brings confusion with the universal(sāmānya) maintained by the Vaisesika School; (6)Though the SarvastivādaVaibhāsikas try to prove it by the Sūtra, the Sūtra does not prove the theory of the real existence of the homogeneous character. |
|---|
| 目次 | 2-4-3. 衆同分 69
2-4-3-1. 衆同分の定義 69
2-4-3-2. 衆同分の分類 71
2-4-3-3. 衆同分の実在論証 72
2-4-3-4. 衆同分の得捨 74
2-4-3-5. 経部による衆同分実在論批判 77
2-4-3-5-1. 批判（１）―異生性は無用― 78
2-4-3-5-2. 批判（２）―同分は認識手段によって認識されない― 81
2-4-3-5-3. 批判（３）―何故非有情の衆同分が認められないのか― 84
2-4-3-5-4. 批判（４）―衆同分にさらに衆同分があることになる過失― 86
2-4-3-5-5. 批判（５）―ヴァイシェーシカ学派の普遍との混同― 88
2-4-3-5-6. 批判（６）―同分の教証とそれに対する批判― 90 |
|---|
| ISSN | 13427377 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 242 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2020.08.07 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2020.08.07 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
