|
|
|
|
|
|
운묵의 『釋迦如來行蹟頌』에 나타난 회통사상연구=A Study on Unmuk’s unification of Buddhism |
|
|
|
著者 |
李丙旭 (著)=이병욱 (au.)
|
掲載誌 |
불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
巻号 | v.1 |
出版年月日 | 2000.05 |
ページ | 161 - 188 |
出版者 | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
出版サイト |
http://www.kabs.re.kr/
|
出版地 | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 韓文=Korean |
キーワード | 회통사상; 교판론; 일심삼관 |
抄録 | In this paper I will prove Unmuk's unification of Buddhism in “Eulogy of Shakyamuni Tathagatha's Record of Performances(釋迦如來行蹟頌)”. Unmuk's Buddhism is based the critical classification of the Buddha's teaching by T'ien t'ai school(天台敎判論), and the perfectly harmonious triple truth of T'ien t'ai school(天台一心三觀). On the basis of the perfectly harmonious triple truth of T'ien t'ai school Unmuk says unification of Buddhism. More- over he says unification of the method of buddhist self discipline(修行方法). This is a special feature in Unmuk's unification of Buddhism. It is Unmuk who performs not only unification of Zen and Kyo(敎) Buddhism but also unification of the method of buddhist self discipline. But there is problem in Unmuk's unification of Buddhism. It is contradiction between the critical classification of the Buddha's teaching by T'ien t'ai school(天台敎判論) and unification of Buddhism. If you assert the critical classification of the Buddha's teaching by T'ien t'ai school then you must distort unification of Buddhism. If you assert unification of Buddhism then you must damage the critical classification of the Buddha's teaching by T'ien t'ai school. Unmuk does not know this contradiction. |
目次 | I. 서론 161 II. 운묵의 교판론 164 III. 회통사상 170 1. 당시 불교계의 비회통적 분위기에 대한 운묵의 비판 171 2. 불교사상에 대한 회통 173 3. 수행방법에 대한 회통 181 IV. 결론: 의의와 비판 184 |
ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
ヒット数 | 108 |
作成日 | 2021.03.12 |
更新日期 | 2021.03.17 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|