 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
『成唯識論了義燈』의 圓測說 비판=A Criticism on WonChuk(圓測)’s Yogācāra Buddhism in Ch’eng Wei-Shin Lun Lao-yi Deng(成唯識論了義燈) |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
정영근 (著)=Jung, Yeong-keun (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.3 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2001.12 |
|---|
| ページ | 59 - 91 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.kabs.re.kr/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 韓文=Korean |
|---|
| キーワード | 성유식론요의등; 성유식론소; 성유식론; 원측; 혜소; 도증; 법상종; 신라유식 |
|---|
| 抄録 | Ch'eng Wei-Shin Lun Lao-yi Deng(成唯識論了義燈) is an important source to find differences between Korean and Chinese Yogacara Buddhism. In this book Huiso(惠沼) concentrates his effort to criticize Wonchuk(圓測)'s and his diciple Daoding(道證)'s Yogacara Buddhism.I invesgate and analyze these critiques to clarify differences between the two and to determine which is correct or not in this paper. There are many discrepancies in opinions on many problems, for example the reality of mind and the function of mind after enlightenment etc. And there I found the fact that differences between the two are not the matter of ‘one is correct and the other is false’ but their differences are originated from each point of view and position. Huiso(惠沼) is concerned about analyzing differences of phenomenon and differences of various Buddhist teachings. Therefore he emphasize that Yogacara Buddhism especially Fa-Xiang School(法相宗) is the most excellent and the supreme Buddhist teaching and the other is the lower and insufficient teaching. On the other hand Wonchuk(圓測) is concerned about making all living beings understood and enlightened. And therefore he makes an effort to explain the context and the function of various teachings. In conclusion I can say that Wonchuk(圓測) always keeps the religious purpose to relieve of living beings in his heart, and Huiso(惠沼) takes a scholastic interest to make clear the meaning of various differences. |
|---|
| 目次 | I. 들어가는 말 59
II. 혜소의 불교 이해와 기본 입장 61
III. 『成唯識論了義燈』의 저술 의도와 서술 방식 66
IV. 혜소의 비판 내용에 대한 분석 68
1. 마음의 본체에 대한 논의 68
2. 아뢰야식에 관한 논의 73
3. 마음의 작용 과정에 대한 논의 76
4. 깨달은 후의 마음 작용에 관한 논의 78
5. 그밖에 문제들에 대한 논의 81
V. 혜소의 비판을 통해서 본 원측 유식학의 특징과 의미 85
VI. 맺는 말 88 |
|---|
| ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 120 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2021.03.23 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2021.03.23 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
