|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
大慧宗杲의 默照禪 비판의 대상에 대한 再考=The reconsideration for the target of Silent-illumination Zen criticism by Dahui |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
鄭榮植 (著)=Jeong, Young-sik (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.11 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2005.08 |
|---|
| ページ | 324 - 345 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.kabs.re.kr/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 韓文=Korean |
|---|
| キーワード | 대혜종고=Dàhuì Zōnggǎo; 진헐청료=Zhēnxiē Qīngliǎo; 묵조선=mòzhào Chán; 공안선=gōng'àn Chán; 임제종=LínjǐChán school; 조동종=Cáodòng school |
|---|
| 抄録 | In his 1975 essay "Silent-Illumination and Koan-Introspection in Zen-Buddhism," Seizan Yanagida柳田聖山 suggests that "the criticism by Dahui大慧(1089-1163)was aimed at Zhenxie Qingliao眞歇淸了(1088-1151)." This opinion that has been widely accepted is based upon three pieces of historical records respectively found in Zhu-zi Yulei朱子語類, Dahui Nianpu大慧年譜 and Da-hui Shu大慧書.
This paper challenges Yanagida`s above opinion from the following three aspects. First of all, none of those three supports represented by Yanagida can be regarded as direct evidence to identify Qingliao as the target of Dahui`s criticism. Furthermore, Yanagida does not mention another record saying that Dahui even praised Zhenxie onece during his lecture at the latter. Finally, if Dahui actually had leveled his criticism at Zhenxie, we could have found some traces of their debate in their recorded sayings.
In conclusion, it is considered that there was not any sharp confrontation between Dahui and Zhenxie, and the criticism by Dahui was much possible to be aimed at the followers of Zhenxie more than the master himself. |
|---|
| 目次 | I. 서론 324
II. 본론 324
1. 기존의 연구현황 325
2. 宏智正覺(1091~1157)說 327
3. 眞歇清了(1090~1151)說 330
4. 진헐청료설에 대한 반론 335
III. 결론 344
|
|---|
| ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 78 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2021.04.15 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2021.04.16 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
