|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
『大乗四論玄義記』の研究序說 -- 自己の基本的立場の表明=Preliminary Research on the Dashengsilunxuanyiji : Focusing on the Text's Clarification of its Foundational Standpoint |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
菅野博史 =Kanno, Hiroshi
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
불교학리뷰=Critical Review for Buddhist Studies=仏教学レビュー
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.5 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2009.06.30 |
|---|
| ページ | 65 - 90 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 金剛大學 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.ggu.ac.kr/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Korea [韓國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| ノート | 저자정보: 창가대학 소속 |
|---|
| キーワード | 『大乗四論玄義記』=The Dasheng silun xuanyi ji=Daeseung saron hyeonui gi; 慧均=Huijun; 無依無得=wuyiwude=neither depended on nor obtained; 地摂両論成毘二家=Dishechengpi=Shidjinglun, shedashenglun, chengshilun and Abhichamma; 三論宗=Sanlun school |
|---|
| 抄録 | The Dasheng silun xuanyi ji (in Korean, Daeseung saron hyeonui go) is a very difficult text to read. One reason is that the extant manuscript has many corruptions. Another possible reason -recently proposed- is that the text may have been composed in Korea, and by a monk having insufficient mastery of classical Chinese. Rather than focusing on analyzing the content of this work, this paper first takes under consideration such matters as how the text understands its own standpoint, as well as the scholarly lineage of its author. In order to answer this question, I consider concepts such as "sanlun (three treatises)" , "silun (four treatises)" ,"wuyiwude (neither depended on nor obtained)" , "dasheng (greater vehicle) and so on, in order to clarify its philosophical standpoint. Further, I consider the concept of "yijia (one' s
own tradition)" as well as the Sanlun tradition on Mount she (Senglang, Sengquan and Falang) to identify the genealogy of its scholarly tradition.
Second, this paper considers how the text grasps those objects of criticism that are contradictory to its own standpoint. I take up the concept "Dishechengpi (Shidijinglun, Shedashenglun and Abhidhama)" and make It clear that it sobject of criticism is "yousuode (obtainment)."
|
|---|
| 目次 | 0. 問題の所在 65
1. 『四論玄義』自身の立場に対する捉え方 67
2. 前代教學への批判 - 『地摂両論成毘二家』82
3. 結び 85 |
|---|
| ISSN | 19752660 (P) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.29213/crbs..5.200906.65 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 278 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2021.07.30 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2021.08.13 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
