|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
教宗賢首‧行在彌陀=Researching the Teachings of Hua-yen and Practicing the Way of Pure Land |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
陳英善 =Chen, Ying-shan
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
2015華嚴專宗國際學術研討會論文集上冊
|
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2018.11 |
|---|
| ページ | 205 - 234 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 財團法人臺北市華嚴蓮社 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.huayen.org.tw/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| ノート | 作者單位：中華佛學研究所 研究員
Researcher of Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies) |
|---|
| キーワード | 華嚴=Hua-yen; 賢首=Xian Shou; 解行= scriptural study and practice; 普賢行=the practice of Samantabhadra; 彌陀行=the practice of Amitābha |
|---|
| 抄録 | 近代大師大德們的修行法門，有秉持「教宗賢首‧行在彌陀」（如弘一大師、楊仁山、徐蔚如等人），或有言「教宗賢首‧行在戒律」、「教宗賢首‧行在禪宗」、「教宗賢首‧行在密宗」、……等諸如此類的修行法門。這不禁讓人想到：為何不是「教宗賢首‧行在普賢」？而這到底蘊含了甚麼玄機？是華嚴有教而無觀嗎？什麼是華嚴的觀行法門？華嚴宗如何來看待「解與行」的問題？華嚴觀行與淨土念佛之關係又是如何？……諸如此類問題，值得吾人之深思與探討。因此，基於上述等種種問題，本論文擬從四方面來探討：（一）首先，探討「教宗賢首‧行在彌陀」有否經論的依據？（二）接著，探討華嚴宗諸位大師的觀行法門。（三）進一步探討華嚴之解與行的關係。（四）最後，則針對「普賢行」與「彌陀行」來作探索，尤其以稱名念佛法門來切入，探討彼此之關係，以便吾人對「教宗賢首‧行在彌陀」有一整體性之了解。
In Late Qing and Early Republican China, several venerables and lay Buddhists advocated “Researching the teachings of Hua-yen and practicing the way of Pure Land”, such as Master Hong Yi, Mr. Yang Ren Shan, and Mr. Xu Wei Ru. Some others promoted “Studying Hua-yen teachings and practicing Vinaya”, “Studying Hua-yen teachings and practicing Zen”, “Studying Hua-yen teachings and practicing Esoteric Buddhism”, and so on. Why support these ideas instead of “Studying Hua-yen teachings
and adopting the practice of Samantabhadra”? Is it because the Hua-yen school lack for methods of practice? If not, what is the practice of Hua-yen Buddhism? In terms of the Hua-yen school, what is the relationship between scriptural study and practice? Furthermore, what is the relationship between Hua-yen and Pure Land Buddhism?
These questions deserve our reflection and discussion. This paper includes four parts. The first part reviews whether “Researching the teachings of Hua-yen and practicing the way of Pure Land” is sutra-based. Secondly, Hua-yen masters’ methods of practice are examined, followed by further discussion on the scriptural study and practice of Hua-yen Buddhism. The last part focuses on the connections between the practice of Samantabhadra and the practice of Amitābha, especially from the view of the Buddha-chanting method, in hopes of thoroughly understanding the idea of “Researching the teachings of Hua-yen and practicing the way
of Pure Land”. |
|---|
| 目次 | 一、前言 207
二、「教宗賢首‧行在彌陀」經論之依據 208
三、華嚴宗諸位大師的觀行法門 212
四、華嚴之解與行的關係 216
五、「普賢行」與「彌陀行」之關係 219
（一）普賢行 219
（二）彌陀行 222
六、結語 228 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 800 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2021.12.08 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
