|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
教宗賢首‧行在彌陀=Researching the Teachings of Hua-yen and Practicing the Way of Pure Land |
|
|
|
著者 |
陳英善 =Chen, Ying-shan
|
掲載誌 |
2015華嚴專宗國際學術研討會論文集上冊
|
出版年月日 | 2018.11 |
ページ | 205 - 234 |
出版者 | 財團法人臺北市華嚴蓮社 |
出版サイト |
https://www.huayen.org.tw/
|
出版地 | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
資料の種類 | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
言語 | 中文=Chinese |
ノート | 作者單位:中華佛學研究所 研究員 Researcher of Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies) |
キーワード | 華嚴=Hua-yen; 賢首=Xian Shou; 解行= scriptural study and practice; 普賢行=the practice of Samantabhadra; 彌陀行=the practice of Amitābha |
抄録 | 近代大師大德們的修行法門,有秉持「教宗賢首‧行在彌陀」(如弘一大師、楊仁山、徐蔚如等人),或有言「教宗賢首‧行在戒律」、「教宗賢首‧行在禪宗」、「教宗賢首‧行在密宗」、……等諸如此類的修行法門。這不禁讓人想到:為何不是「教宗賢首‧行在普賢」?而這到底蘊含了甚麼玄機?是華嚴有教而無觀嗎?什麼是華嚴的觀行法門?華嚴宗如何來看待「解與行」的問題?華嚴觀行與淨土念佛之關係又是如何?……諸如此類問題,值得吾人之深思與探討。因此,基於上述等種種問題,本論文擬從四方面來探討:(一)首先,探討「教宗賢首‧行在彌陀」有否經論的依據?(二)接著,探討華嚴宗諸位大師的觀行法門。(三)進一步探討華嚴之解與行的關係。(四)最後,則針對「普賢行」與「彌陀行」來作探索,尤其以稱名念佛法門來切入,探討彼此之關係,以便吾人對「教宗賢首‧行在彌陀」有一整體性之了解。
In Late Qing and Early Republican China, several venerables and lay Buddhists advocated “Researching the teachings of Hua-yen and practicing the way of Pure Land”, such as Master Hong Yi, Mr. Yang Ren Shan, and Mr. Xu Wei Ru. Some others promoted “Studying Hua-yen teachings and practicing Vinaya”, “Studying Hua-yen teachings and practicing Zen”, “Studying Hua-yen teachings and practicing Esoteric Buddhism”, and so on. Why support these ideas instead of “Studying Hua-yen teachings and adopting the practice of Samantabhadra”? Is it because the Hua-yen school lack for methods of practice? If not, what is the practice of Hua-yen Buddhism? In terms of the Hua-yen school, what is the relationship between scriptural study and practice? Furthermore, what is the relationship between Hua-yen and Pure Land Buddhism? These questions deserve our reflection and discussion. This paper includes four parts. The first part reviews whether “Researching the teachings of Hua-yen and practicing the way of Pure Land” is sutra-based. Secondly, Hua-yen masters’ methods of practice are examined, followed by further discussion on the scriptural study and practice of Hua-yen Buddhism. The last part focuses on the connections between the practice of Samantabhadra and the practice of Amitābha, especially from the view of the Buddha-chanting method, in hopes of thoroughly understanding the idea of “Researching the teachings of Hua-yen and practicing the way of Pure Land”. |
目次 | 一、前言 207 二、「教宗賢首‧行在彌陀」經論之依據 208 三、華嚴宗諸位大師的觀行法門 212 四、華嚴之解與行的關係 216 五、「普賢行」與「彌陀行」之關係 219 (一)普賢行 219 (二)彌陀行 222 六、結語 228 |
ヒット数 | 763 |
作成日 | 2021.12.08 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|