|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resilient Relations: Rethinking Truth, Reconciliation, and Justice in Cambodia |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
DeAngelo, Darcie (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Journal of Global Buddhism
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.22 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2021 |
|---|
| ページ | 173 - 189 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Journal of Global Buddhism |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.unilu.ch/en/faculties/faculty-of-humanities-and-social-sciences/institutes-departements-and-research-centres/department-for-the-study-of-religions/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Lucerne, Switzerland |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | relationality; Theravada Buddhism; postwar; resilience; Cambodia |
|---|
| 抄録 | In her critique of the Khmer Rouge tribunals, the legal scholar Virginia Hancock suggests that tribunal forms of justice could fail Cambodia. For them to succeed, she recommends that the tribunals account for the fact that Buddhism emphasizes a “community-oriented theory of crimes against humanity,” in that the judges should not understand harm as involving only individual culprits and victims (2008: 88). This individuality, she suggests, does not consider the modes of resilience enacted by Theravada Buddhists. As I will show in this paper, some Cambodians have dealt with violence from the past differently than a strict categorization of perpetrator and victim. Who can be held accountable for that violence if everyone is, at once, perpetrator and victim? Given this mode of being-in-the-world, how do people find resilience in the face of past trauma? |
|---|
| 目次 | Disrupted Relations 176
Insolubilities 177
Please pity-love [me] 180
Perpetrators and victims 181
Handlers and animals 183
Activists and police 185
Men and Monsters 185 |
|---|
| ISSN | 15276457 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.5281/zenodo.4727589 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 89 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.03.04 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.03.04 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
