|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcendental Arguments and Practical Reason in Indian Philosophy |
|
|
|
著者 |
Arnold, Dan (著)
|
掲載誌 |
Argumentation
|
巻号 | v.22 n.1 |
出版年月日 | 2008 |
ページ | 135 - 147 |
出版者 | Springer |
出版サイト |
https://link.springer.com/
|
出版地 | Dordrecht, the Netherlands [多德雷赫特, 荷蘭] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 英文=English |
キーワード | Transcendental argument; Practical reason; Madhyamaka Buddhism; Mimamsa; Self-contradiction |
抄録 | This paper examines some Indian philosophical arguments that are understandable as transcendental arguments—i.e., arguments whose conclusions cannot be denied without self-contradiction, insofar as the truth of the claim in question is a condition of the possibility even of any such denial. This raises the question of what kind of self-contradiction is involved—e.g., pragmatic self-contradiction, or the kind that goes with logical necessity. It is suggested that these arguments involve something like practical reason—indeed, that they just are arguments against the primacy of “theoretical reason.” This characterization illuminates a characteristically Indic appeal to ordinary language. |
目次 | 1 Introduction: Transcendental Arguments and Practical Reason 135 2 Mimamsaka Arguments for the Eternality of Language 139 3 Madhyamaka Arguments for "Emptiness" 142 4 Conclusion 145 |
ISSN | 0920427X (P); 15728374 (E) |
DOI | 10.1007/s10503-007-9078-3 |
ヒット数 | 248 |
作成日 | 2022.05.10 |
更新日期 | 2022.05.10 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|