|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
真宗無明論=Shin Buddhist Theory on Ignorance (Mumyō) |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
紅楳英顕 (著)=Kobai, Eiken (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.66 n.2 (總號=n.144) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2018.03.20 |
|---|
| ページ | 621 - 627 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 無明; 痴無明; 疑無明; 法雷学派 |
|---|
| 抄録 | In Buddhism, ignorance (mumyō) is understood as the root cause of human delusions. In the Jōdo Shinshū tradition, however, scholars have developed a theory identifying two types of ignorance: ignorance as blind passions themselves (chimumyō), and ignorance as doubting salvation through Amida’s Original Vow (gimumyō).
In recent years, some Shin scholars have presented their opinions against this traditional theory identifying two types of ignorance by maintaining that Shinran did not use the concept of ignorance as doubting Amida’s Original Vow. I disagree.
The Hōrai school, one of the traditional schools of Shin Buddhism, developed a unique interpretation of Shinran’s understanding of the concept of ignorance, opposing the traditional view identifying two types of ignorance. In this paper, I will reexamine the Shin Buddhist theory on ignorance by consulting this alternative theory on ignorance developed by the Hōrai school scholars. |
|---|
| 目次 | はじめに 621
一 法雷学派の無明論 621
三 法雷学派の無明論の特徴 622
四 村上速水氏の見解と法雷学派の見解の相違点 623
五 村上氏の見解の問題点 623
むすび 626 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.2_621 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 78 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.08.02 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.02 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
