|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Śrī Swāminārāyaṇ’s Position on Śabdapramāṇa and Śruti: Questions of Epistemic and Theological Validity |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Bilimoria, Purushottama (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Journal of Dharma Studies: Asian and Transcultural Religion, Philosophy, & Ethics
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.1 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2018.10 |
|---|
| ページ | 45 - 67 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Springer |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.springer.com/gp
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | Authors and Affiliations: Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA; UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94709, USA; School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia |
|---|
| キーワード | Swaminārāyaṇ; Sahajānand; Pramāṇa; Śabdapramāṇa; Śruti; Smṛti; Vachanāmrut; Vedānta; prasthāna-trayī; Śaṅkara; Rāmānuja; Apauruṣeya; Scriptural authority; Bhagawān; hermeneutics; Swaminarayan Sampradāya |
|---|
| 抄録 | This paper argues that Śrī Swāminārāyaṇ espoused a position on the pramāṇa-s (means of knowing), and his theory was that among these it is śabdapramāṇa that is the important and authoritative pramāṇa. However, in delineating the precise sources and textual authority that fall within the ambit of śabdapramāṇa, he privileged mostly the Smṛti texts, along with Vedānta and Bhagavadgītā commentaries, to which was added later his own Gujarati text Vachanāmrut, as canonical texts of the particular Sampradāya. In so doing, he would be seen to be departing somewhat from classical positions on authoritative scriptures, in particular of Śaṅkara and, to an extent, Rāmānuja, for whom Śruti (‘revealed’) and Smṛti (‘recollected’) scriptures respectively denote quite different genre of texts, and with graded degree (rather kind) of authority; the former could even be apauruṣeya, authorless scriptures. The paper analyses the precise reasons for Swāminārāyaṇ arriving at this qualified position and the arguments he garnishes towards this doctrinal hermeneutic, concluding with comments on his slight departure from the classically accepted understanding of śabdapramāṇa where scriptural sources are the preeminent concern with a somewhat different epistemological trajectory. |
|---|
| ISSN | 25220926 (P); 25220934 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42240-018-0014-4 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 71 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.08.16 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.16 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
