|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
『決定往生集』における極楽浄土観:依報決定に説く道綽解釈に注目して=The Pure Land in Chingaiʼs 珍海 Ketsujō ōjō shū 決定往生集: Chingaiʼs understanding of Daochuo 道綽 in Chapter 1 |
|
|
|
著者 |
服部純啓 (著)=Hattori, Junkei (au.)
|
掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
巻号 | v.68 n.1 (總號=n.149) |
出版年月日 | 2019.12.20 |
ページ | 65 - 68 |
出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 日文=Japanese |
キーワード | 珍海; 『決定往生集』; 依報決定; 極楽観; 道綽 |
抄録 | In Chapter 1 of his Ketsujō ōjō shū 決定往生集, Chingai 珍海 introduces his view of the Pure Land. He basically relies on the ideas of Jingying Huiyuan 浄影寺慧遠 and Jizang 吉蔵, and defines a Pure Land as a land of inferiority compared with all other Pure Lands in the ten quarters.
Moreover, Chingai reinforces his idea of a Pure Land as a shabby land by explaining that both Tanluan 曇鸞 and Daochuo 道綽 also interpreted Maitreya’s land as a poor land for people with inferior abilities. However in Tanluan’s Wangsheng lunzhu 往生論註 and Daochuo’s Anleji 安楽集, there are no explicit references that a Pure Land is an inferior place. On the contrary, they seem to demonstrate that Amitābha’s Pure Land is better than all the other Pure Lands. Therefore, it can be said that the basic understanding concerning the idea of Pure Land of Tanluan and Daochuo and that of Chingai are contradictory. Chingai describes his Pure Land as a crude place based on Huiyuan’s and Jizang’s interpretations of that land mentioned in the Avataṁsaka Sūtra. From this, we can say that Chingai tries to support his concept of a Pure Land by correlating his theory with Daochuo’s idea of that land defined in his Anleji. |
目次 | 一 はじめに 65 二 珍海の極楽規定 65 三 道綽の極楽観と珍海の解釈 66 四 おわりに 67 |
ISSN | 00194344 (P) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_65 |
ヒット数 | 196 |
作成日 | 2022.09.21 |
更新日期 | 2022.09.21 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|