|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
作有縁性（satpratyayakartṛtva）について=On satpratyayakartṛtva |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
護山真也 (著)=Moriyama, Shinya (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.68 n.1 (總號=n.149) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2019.12.20 |
|---|
| ページ | 375 - 368 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 四相違; 有法差別相違因; 作有縁性; 基; 文軌; 善珠 |
|---|
| 抄録 | This article reevaluates the East Asian Buddhist yinming/inmyō (因明) tradition as a bridge between South Asian and East Asian traditions of Buddhist logic. Specifically, focus is placed on the concept of satpratyayakartṛtva or “producing the cognition ‘existent’,” which has its background in Vaiśeṣikasūtra I.2.7. In Xuanzang’s translation of Śaṅkarasvāmin’s Nyāyapraveśaka, this term was translated as zuo you yuan xing (作有縁性). Xuanzang’s disciple Wengui (文軌) seems to have understood well its original Sanskrit meaning, whereas another disciple, Ji (基), offered a different understanding based on the dual meaning of you yuan: the cognition ‘existent’ and the object that possesses the cognition. Although the second interpretation seems peculiar in this context, his intention lies in maintaining the rule that the property to be proved in this thesis, including satpratyayakartṛtva, should be applied to both the subject matter, i.e., sattā, as well as to similar examples, like sāmānyaviśeṣa. In order to satisfy the demand, Ji interpreted the Chinese term to mean “forming the object’s nature that produces a cognition.” |
|---|
| 目次 | 1．NP における作有縁性とその背景 375
2．作有縁性に関する基の解釈 374
3．文軌の解釈との比較 371
4．結語 370 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_375 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 131 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.09.23 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.09.23 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
