|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
「一瞬」を測る方法:新ニヤーヤ学派における刹那の形而上学=How to Measure a Moment: Navya-nyāya Metaphysics of kṣaṇa |
|
|
|
著者 |
岩崎陽一 (著)=Iwasaki, Yoichi (au.)
|
掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
巻号 | v.68 n.2 (總號=n.150) |
出版年月日 | 2020.03.20 |
ページ | 1084 - 1077 |
出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 日文=Japanese |
キーワード | 時間; 刹那; kṣaṇa; 形而上学 |
抄録 | Raghunātha, a fifteenth-century Nyāya scholar, composed a short treatise called Padārthatattvanirūpaṇa, in which he criticized the Vaiśeṣika’s category system accepted at the time and claimed the necessity of radical revisions of the system. Among a number of targets of criticism stands the reductionism of “moment” of kṣaṇa. Traditionally, Vaiśeṣika holds that people refer to a motion of a substance when they delimit time and measure moments. Raghunātha, however, does not think that a motion of a substance helps us measure moments, and postulates the existence of kṣaṇa, which is a momentary entity and irreducible to any of the known categories. In this paper, I survey the history of the controversy between reductionism and anti-reductionism of kṣaṇa in Vaiśeṣika, focusing on Vallabha, Vardhamāna, and Raghunātha, and present the close relation of Ragunātha to Vardhamāna. Based on this historical survey, I further examine the philosophical significance of postulating kṣaṇa as a new category. The most significant point may be that the metaphysical necessity for postulating kṣaṇa is derived from the Vaiśeṣika’s popular theorem of causality that the diversity of causes prohibits the uniformity of results. |
目次 | 1.はじめに 1084 2.思想史 1083 2.1. 概略 1083 2.2. ヴァッラバの対論者 1083 2.3. ヴァッラバ 1081 2.4. ヴァルダマーナ 1080 2.5. ラグナータ 1080 2.6. ラグナータの刹那論の思想史的特徴 1079 3.刹那の形而上学 1078 |
ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.2_1084 |
ヒット数 | 310 |
作成日 | 2022.09.29 |
更新日期 | 2022.09.29 |

|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|