|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
パタンジャリと非パーニニ文法学=Patañjali and Non-Pāṇinian Grammar |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
矢崎長潤 (著)=Yazaki, Chojun (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.69 n.1 (總號=n.152) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2020.12.25 |
|---|
| ページ | 480 - 477 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | チャンドラゴーミン; Cāndravyākaraṇa; Aṣṭādhyāyī; パタンジャリ |
|---|
| 抄録 | In this paper I point out that some grammatical explanations concerning Patañjali’s proposal for Pāṇini’s rule A 3.4.32 can also be found in some earlier non-Pāṇinian treatises, especially in the Cāndravṛtti on Cāndrasūtra by Candragomin (fifth century) as well as in the extensive Cāndravyākaraṇapañjikā by Ratnamati (ca. 900–980); in response to these, Kaiyaṭa (early eleventh century) seems to criticize the views of Cāndra grammarians. Presenting a chronological overview of the arguments proposed by Patañjali, the Cāndra grammarians, and Kaiyaṭa, I conclude that the arguments we find in the Cāndra tradition can help us understand arguments of the Mahābhāṣya more precisely. Furthermore, Kaiyaṭa’s criticism against the Cāndra system suggests that the Cāndra grammar had become well-known among Pāṇinīyas at that time, and had an influence on the Pāṇinian tradition. |
|---|
| 目次 | 1．はじめに 480
2．パタンジャリとチャンドラ文法学の見解 480
3．チャンドラ文法学における二つの見解 479
4．カイヤタの批判 478
5．おわりに 478 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.1_480 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 56 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.10.07 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.10.07 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
